Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558666›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2021

Clinical impact of panel-based error-corrected next generation sequencing versus flow cytometry to detect measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Nikhil Patkar, Chinmayee Kakirde, Anam Fatima Shaikh, Rakhi Salve, Prasanna Bhanshe, Gaurav Chatterjee, Sweta Rajpal, Swapnali Joshi, Shruti Chaudhary, Rohan Kodgule and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Measurable Residual Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Study on the impact of CD4Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhil PatkarHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India. nvpatkar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-2857
Chinmayee KakirdeHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Anam Fatima ShaikhHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Rakhi SalveHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Prasanna BhansheHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Gaurav ChatterjeeHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sweta RajpalHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Swapnali JoshiHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Shruti ChaudharyHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Rohan KodguleHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sitaram GhoghaleHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Nilesh DeshpandeHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Dhanalaxmi ShettyDept of Cytogenetics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Syed Hasan KhizerDept of Cytogenetics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Hasmukh JainDept of Cytogenetics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Bhausaheb BagalHomi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Hari MenonHaemato-Oncology, CyteCare Cancer Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Navin KhattryDept of Cytogenetics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5708-6472
Manju SengarHomi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Prashant TembhareHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9030-0415
Papagudi SubramanianHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-5937
Sumeet GujralHaematopathology Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INHomi Bhabha National Institute · INHCG Cancer Hospital · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHI/14/1/501485Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We accrued 201 patients of adult AML treated with conventional therapy, in morphological remission, and evaluated MRD using sensitive error-corrected next generation sequencing (NGS-MRD) and multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM-MRD) at the end of induction (PI) and consolidation (PC). Nearly 71% of patients were PI NGS-MRD

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleFlow CytometryHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm, ResidualRecurrenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33558666
PMCPMC8102181
OpenAlexW3127495424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.