Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558665›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021

Treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: focus on second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors.

Fred Saad, Martin Bögemann, Kazuhiro Suzuki, Neal Shore

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Japan: The ARASHI Study.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fred SaadDepartment of Urology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CHUM), Montreal Cancer Institute/CRCHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada. fred.saad@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-5617
Martin BögemannDepartment of Urology, Münster University Medical Center, Münster, Germany.
Kazuhiro SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Neal ShoreCarolina Urologic Research Center, Atlantic Urology Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-0548
Carolina Urologic Research Center · USCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAGunma University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as a rising prostate-specific antigen concentration, despite castrate levels of testosterone with ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy or orchiectomy, and no detectable metastases by conventional imaging. Patients with nmCRPC progress to metastatic disease and are at risk of developing cancer-related symptoms and morbidity, eventually dying of their disease. While patients with nmCRPC are generally asymptomatic from their disease, they are often older and have chronic comorbidities that require long-term concomitant medication. Therefore, careful consideration of the benefit-risk profile of potential treatments is required.

methodsIn this review, we will discuss the rationale for early treatment of patients with nmCRPC to delay metastatic progression and prolong survival, as well as the factors influencing this treatment decision. We will focus on oral pharmacotherapy with the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, and the importance of balancing the clinical benefit they offer with potential adverse events and the consequential impact on quality of life, physical capacity, and cognitive function. RESULTS AND

conclusionsWhile the definition of nmCRPC is well established, the advent of next-generation imaging techniques capable of detecting hitherto undetectable oligometastatic disease in patients with nmCRPC has fostered debate on the criteria that inform the management of these patients. However, despite these developments, published consensus statements have maintained that the absence of metastases on conventional imaging suffices to guide such therapeutic decisions. In addition, the prolonged metastasis-free survival and recently reported positive overall survival outcomes of the three second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors have provided further evidence for the early use of these agents in patients with nmCRPC in order to delay metastases and prolong survival. Here, we discuss the benefit-risk profiles of apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide based on the data available from their pivotal clinical trials in patients with nmCRPC.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsHumansMaleProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantReceptors, AndrogenAndrogen AntagonistsAR protein, humanReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID33558665
PMCPMC8134049
OpenAlexW3126274126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.