Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558498›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Droplet printing reveals the importance of micron-scale structure for bacterial ecology.

Ravinash Krishna Kumar, Thomas A Meiller-Legrand, Alessandro Alcinesio, Diego Gonzalez, Despoina A I Mavridou, Oliver J Meacock, William P J Smith, Linna Zhou, Wook Kim, Gökçe Su Pulcu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. mBio · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ravinash Krishna KumarDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1223-1098
Thomas A Meiller-LegrandDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alessandro AlcinesioDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-7640
Diego GonzalezDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Despoina A I MavridouDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Oliver J MeacockDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6269-9855
William P J SmithDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9270-7614
Linna ZhouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Wook KimDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6818-9688
Gökçe Su PulcuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hagan BayleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. hagan.bayley@chem.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2499-6116
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kevin.foster@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-6633
University of Oxford · GBDuquesne University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009505/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 209397/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria often live in diverse communities where the spatial arrangement of strains and species is considered critical for their ecology. However, a test of this hypothesis requires manipulation at the fine scales at which spatial structure naturally occurs. Here we develop a droplet-based printing method to arrange bacterial genotypes across a sub-millimetre array. We print strains of the gut bacterium Escherichia coli that naturally compete with one another using protein toxins. Our experiments reveal that toxin-producing strains largely eliminate susceptible non-producers when genotypes are well-mixed. However, printing strains side-by-side creates an ecological refuge where susceptible strains can persist in large numbers. Moving to competitions between toxin producers reveals that spatial structure can make the difference between one strain winning and mutual destruction. Finally, we print different potential barriers between competing strains to understand how ecological refuges form, which shows that cells closest to a toxin producer mop up the toxin and protect their clonemates. Our work provides a method to generate customised bacterial communities with defined spatial distributions, and reveals that micron-scale changes in these distributions can drive major shifts in ecology.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalColicinsEscherichia coliGenotypeMicrobiotaColicins

Identifiers

PMID33558498
PMCPMC7870943
OpenAlexW3127957635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.