Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558361›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Multiple system atrophy in Hokkaido, Japan: a prospective registry study of natural history and symptom assessment scales followed for 5 years.

Masaaki Matsushima, Ichiro Yabe, Ken Sakushima, Yasuhiro Kanatani, Naoki Nishimoto, Takeshi Matsuoka, Jun Sawada, Haruo Uesugi, Kazuya Sako, Asako Takei and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Masaaki MatsushimaDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan mmasaaki@huhp.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-3686
Ichiro YabeDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ken SakushimaDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasuhiro KanataniDepartment of Health Crisis Management, National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
Naoki NishimotoDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi MatsuokaDepartment of Neurology, Date Red Cross Hospital, Date, Hokkaido, Japan.
Jun SawadaCardiovascular, Respiratory and Neurology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Haruo UesugiDepartment of Medical Service, Aizen Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuya SakoDepartment of Neurology, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Asako TakeiHokuyukai Neurological Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Akiko TamakoshiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Shun ShimohamaDepartment of Neurology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Norihiro SatoHokkaido University Hospital Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Seiji KikuchiHokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hidenao SasakiDepartment of Neurology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultiple system atrophy (MSA) is a refractory neurodegenerative disease, but novel treatments are anticipated. An accurate natural history of MSA is important for clinical trials, but is insufficient. This regional registry was launched to complement clinical information on MSA.

settingPatient recruitment started in November 2014 and is ongoing at the time of submission. The number of participating facilities was 66. Postal surveys were sent to medical facilities and patients with MSA in Hokkaido, Japan.

participantsAfter obtaining written consent from 196 participants, 184 overview surveys and 115 detailed surveys were conducted. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: An overview survey evaluated conformity to diagnostic criteria and a detailed survey implemented an annual assessment based on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS).

resultsAt the time of registration, 58.2% of patients were diagnosed with cerebellar symptoms predominant type MSA (MSA-C) and 29.9% were diagnosed with parkinsonism predominant type MSA (MSA-P). UMSARS Part Ⅳ score of 4 or 5 accounted for 53.8% of participants. The higher the UMSARS Part Ⅳ score, the higher the proportion of MSA-P. At baseline, levodopa was used by 69 patients (37.5%) and the average levodopa dose was 406.7 mg/day. The frequency of levodopa use increased over time. Eleven cases changed from MSA-C to MSA-P during the study, but the opposite was not observed. Information about survival and causes of death was collected on 54 cases. Half of deaths were respiratory-related. Sudden death was recorded even in the group with UMSARS Part Ⅳ score of 1.

conclusionsThis study is the first large-scale prospective MSA cohort study in Asia. MSA-C was dominant, but the use of antiparkinsonian drugs increased over the study period. Changes from MSA-C to MSA-P occurred, but not vice versa.

Indexed as

Multiple System AtrophyAsiaCohort StudiesHumansJapanRegistriesSymptom Assessmentepidemiologygeriatric medicineneurology

Identifiers

PMID33558361
PMCPMC7871682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.