ArticleBMJ open2021
Multiple system atrophy in Hokkaido, Japan: a prospective registry study of natural history and symptom assessment scales followed for 5 years.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of survival and prognostic factors in multiple system atrophy.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Natural history and 12-month progression of multiple system atrophy in a Chinese cohort.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- An eight-year follow-up of the CMSAR: assessing how the new MDS criteria and biomarkers impact diagnostic accuracy.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Rapidly Progressive Multiple System Atrophy-Cerebellar Type in a 52-Year-Old Woman: Diagnostic Challenges in a Resource-Limited Setting.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Trends in Invasive Interventions and Risk Factors for Early Critical Events in Multiple System Atrophy.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- The Movement Disorder Society Criteria: Its Clinical Usefulness in Multiple System Atrophy.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Cerebellar form of multiple system atrophy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- FGF14 GAA repeat expansion and ZFHX3 GGC repeat expansion in clinically diagnosed multiple system atrophy patients.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- The comorbidity profiles and medication issues of patients with multiple system atrophy: a systematic cross-sectional analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Multiple system atrophy: at the crossroads of cellular, molecular and genetic mechanisms.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Multiple system atrophy-cerebellar: A case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Sensitivity to Change and Patient-Centricity of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale Items: A Data-Driven Analysis.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022Article
- Video Representation of Dopamine-Responsive Multiple System Atrophy Cerebellar Type.The American journal of case reports · 2021Article
- Phytochemicals as Regulators of Genes Involved in Synucleinopathies.Biomolecules · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMultiple system atrophy (MSA) is a refractory neurodegenerative disease, but novel treatments are anticipated. An accurate natural history of MSA is important for clinical trials, but is insufficient. This regional registry was launched to complement clinical information on MSA.
settingPatient recruitment started in November 2014 and is ongoing at the time of submission. The number of participating facilities was 66. Postal surveys were sent to medical facilities and patients with MSA in Hokkaido, Japan.
participantsAfter obtaining written consent from 196 participants, 184 overview surveys and 115 detailed surveys were conducted. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: An overview survey evaluated conformity to diagnostic criteria and a detailed survey implemented an annual assessment based on the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS).
resultsAt the time of registration, 58.2% of patients were diagnosed with cerebellar symptoms predominant type MSA (MSA-C) and 29.9% were diagnosed with parkinsonism predominant type MSA (MSA-P). UMSARS Part Ⅳ score of 4 or 5 accounted for 53.8% of participants. The higher the UMSARS Part Ⅳ score, the higher the proportion of MSA-P. At baseline, levodopa was used by 69 patients (37.5%) and the average levodopa dose was 406.7 mg/day. The frequency of levodopa use increased over time. Eleven cases changed from MSA-C to MSA-P during the study, but the opposite was not observed. Information about survival and causes of death was collected on 54 cases. Half of deaths were respiratory-related. Sudden death was recorded even in the group with UMSARS Part Ⅳ score of 1.
conclusionsThis study is the first large-scale prospective MSA cohort study in Asia. MSA-C was dominant, but the use of antiparkinsonian drugs increased over the study period. Changes from MSA-C to MSA-P occurred, but not vice versa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.