Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33558229›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change.

Mark A Titley, Stuart H M Butchart, Victoria R Jones, Mark J Whittingham, Stephen G Willis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. To implement the Belém Declaration, we need a structured and collaborative approach.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers of conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Estimating the legibility of international borders.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Role of national regime ideology for predicting biodiversity outcomes.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Integrating biogeography and behavioral ecology to rapidly address biodiversity loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A TitleyDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, DH1 3LE Durham, United Kingdom; mark.a.titley@durham.ac.uk s.g.willis@durham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4170-0535
Stuart H M ButchartBirdLife International, CB2 3QZ Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-4049
Victoria R JonesBirdLife International, CB2 3QZ Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mark J WhittinghamSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-3454
Stephen G WillisDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, DH1 3LE Durham, United Kingdom; mark.a.titley@durham.ac.uk s.g.willis@durham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8656-5808
Durham University · GBBirdLife international · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underlying sociopolitical factors have emerged as important determinants of wildlife population trends and the effectiveness of conservation action. Despite mounting research into the impacts of climate change on nature, there has been little consideration of the human context in which these impacts occur, particularly at the global scale. We investigate this in two ways. First, by modeling the climatic niches of terrestrial mammals and birds globally, we show that projected species loss under climate change is greatest in countries with weaker governance and lower Gross Domestic Product, with loss of mammal species projected to be greater in countries with lower CO

Indexed as

Climate ChangePolitical SystemsAnimalsBirdsEndangered SpeciesGreenhouse EffectMammalsbiodiversityclimate changeconservationpolitical borderstransboundary

Identifiers

PMID33558229
PMCPMC7896304
OpenAlexW3128395219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.