ArticlePopulation health metrics2021
Stillbirth maternity care measurement and associated factors in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study.
Article in Population health metrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and risk factors for stillbirth in Kenya, Mozambique and the Gambia: the PRECISE cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Africa · 2026Article
- Machine learning analysis of pregnancy-related factors and stillbirth: a retrospective cohort study of 65,000 pregnant women in Shuyang, Suqian, Jiangsu, China, 2019-2024.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Disparities in stillbirth rates according to municipal deprivation levels: a nationwide study in Brazil.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Relevant Condition at Death and customized birthweight centiles for stillbirth classification: A retrospective cohort study.Qatar medical journal · 2025Article
- Perinatal care and its association with perinatal death among women attending care in three district hospitals of western Uganda.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence from cross-sectional surveys on hidden caesarean sections among women with stillbirths in Ghana, 2007 and 2017.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Stillbirth undercount in the sample registration system and national family health survey, India.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Review
- "Your heart keeps bleeding": lived experiences of parents with a perinatal death in Northern Uganda.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- "Too much, too late": data on stillbirths to improve interpretation of caesarean section rates.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022Article
- Survey of women's report for 33 maternal and newborn indicators: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
- Count Every Newborn: EN-INDEPTH study to improve pregnancy outcome measurement in population-based surveys.Population health metrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHousehold surveys remain important sources of maternal and child health data, but until now, standard surveys such as Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) have not collected information on maternity care for women who have experienced a stillbirth. Thus, nationally representative data are lacking to inform programmes to address the millions of stillbirths which occur annually.
methodsThe EN-INDEPTH population-based survey of women of reproductive age was undertaken in five Health and Demographic Surveillance System sites in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau and Uganda (2017-2018). All women answered a full birth history with additional questions on pregnancy losses (FBH+) or full pregnancy history (FPH). A sub-sample, including all women reporting a recent stillbirth or neonatal death, was asked additional maternity care questions. These were evaluated using descriptive measures. Associations between stillbirth and maternal socio-demographic characteristics, babies' characteristics and maternity care use were assessed using a weighted logistic regression model for women in the FBH+ group.
resultsA total of 15,591 women reporting a birth since 1 January 2012 answered maternity care questions. Completeness was very high (> 99%), with similar proportions of responses for both live and stillbirths. Amongst the 14,991 births in the FBH+ group, poorer wealth status, higher parity, large perceived baby size-at-birth, preterm or post-term birth, birth in a government hospital compared to other locations and vaginal birth were associated with increased risk of stillbirth after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Regarding association with reported postnatal care, women with a stillbirth were more likely to report hospital stays of > 1 day. However, women with a stillbirth were less likely to report having received a postnatal check compared to those with a live birth.
conclusionsWomen who had experienced stillbirth were able to respond to questions about pregnancy and birth, and we found no reason to omit questions to these women in household surveys. Our analysis identified several potentially modifiable factors associated with stillbirth, adding to the evidence-base for policy and action in low- and middle-income contexts. Including these questions in DHS-8 would lead to increased availability of population-level data to inform action to end preventable stillbirths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.