Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33557811›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

Lack of redundancy between electrophysiological measures of long-range neuronal communication.

Daniel Strahnen, Sampath K T Kapanaiah, Alexei M Bygrave, Dennis Kätzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel StrahnenInstitute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany. daniel.strahnen@uni-ulm.de.
Sampath K T KapanaiahInstitute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Alexei M BygraveDepartment of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Dennis KätzelInstitute of Applied Physiology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany. dennis.kaetzel@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-9823

Funding

Brain and Behavior Research Foundation 22616Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KA 4594/2-1Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung GSO/EKFS 12Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication between brain areas has been implicated in a wide range of cognitive and emotive functions and is impaired in numerous mental disorders. In rodent models, various metrics have been used to quantify inter-regional neuronal communication. However, in individual studies, typically, only very few measures of coupling are reported and, hence, redundancy across such indicators is implicitly assumed.

resultsIn order to test this assumption, we here comparatively assessed a broad range of directional and non-directional metrics like coherence, Weighted Phase Lag Index (wPLI), phase-locking value (PLV), pairwise phase consistency (PPC), parametric and non-parametric Granger causality (GC), partial directed coherence (PDC), directed transfer function (DTF), spike-phase coupling (SPC), cross-regional phase-amplitude coupling, amplitude cross-correlations and others. We applied these analyses to simultaneous field recordings from the prefrontal cortex and the ventral and dorsal hippocampus in the schizophrenia-related Gria1-knockout mouse model which displays a robust novelty-induced hyperconnectivity phenotype. Using the detectability of coupling deficits in Gria1

conclusionsOur analysis highlights the difficulty of quantifying real correlates of inter-regional information transfer, underscores the need to assess multiple coupling measures and provides some guidelines which metrics to choose for a comprehensive, yet non-redundant characterization of functional connectivity.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleHippocampusMaleMiceMice, KnockoutNeuronsPrefrontal CortexAmplitude cross-correlationGranger causalityGria1Hippocampal-prefrontal coherencePairwise phase-consistencyPartial directed coherencePhase-amplitude couplingPhase-locking valueSpike-phase couplingwPLI

Identifiers

PMID33557811
PMCPMC7871592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.