ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
DRPnet: automated particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs using deep regression.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- CryoPromptSeg: prompt-guided segmentation with integrated denoising for cryo-EM particle picking.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- CryoSIP: unleashing protein high-resolution Cryo-EM via semantic-instance collaborative picking.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Molecular Interplay Between RXLR-EncodedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Self-supervised learning for generalizable particle picking in cryo-EM micrographs.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- A large-scale curated and filterable dataset for cryo-EM foundation model pre-training.Scientific data · 2025Article
- RNA sample optimization for cryo-EM analysis.Nature protocols · 2025Review
- AI-based methods for biomolecular structure modeling for Cryo-EM.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in cryo-EM protein particle picking: recent advances and remaining challenges.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- REliable PIcking by Consensus (REPIC): a consensus methodology for harnessing multiple cryo-EM particle pickers.Communications biology · 2024Article
- MiLoPYP: self-supervised molecular pattern mining and particle localization in situ.Nature methods · 2024Article
- CryoSegNet: accurate cryo-EM protein particle picking by integrating the foundational AI image segmentation model and attention-gated U-Net.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Accurate cryo-EM protein particle picking by integrating the foundational AI image segmentation model and specialized U-Net.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- CryoTransformer: a transformer model for picking protein particles from cryo-EM micrographs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Novel Artificial Intelligence-Based Approaches for Ab Initio Structure Determination and Atomic Model Building for Cryo-Electron Microscopy.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Computational Methods Toward Unbiased Pattern Mining and Structure Determination in Cryo-Electron Tomography Data.Journal of molecular biology · 2023Review
- From Deep Mutational Mapping of Allosteric Protein Landscapes to Deep Learning of Allostery and Hidden Allosteric Sites: Zooming in on "Allosteric Intersection" of Biochemical and Big Data Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cryo-Electron Microscopy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- EPicker is an exemplar-based continual learning approach for knowledge accumulation in cryoEM particle picking.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Deep Learning-Based Cell Detection and Extraction in Thin Blood Smears for Malaria Diagnosis.IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop : [proceedings]. IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop · 2021Article
- High-Throughput Cryo-EM Enabled by User-Free Preprocessing Routines.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentification and selection of protein particles in cryo-electron micrographs is an important step in single particle analysis. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based particle picking network to automatically detect particle centers from cryoEM micrographs. This is a challenging task due to the nature of cryoEM data, having low signal-to-noise ratios with variable particle sizes, shapes, distributions, grayscale variations as well as other undesirable artifacts.
resultsWe propose a double convolutional neural network (CNN) cascade for automated detection of particles in cryo-electron micrographs. This approach, entitled Deep Regression Picker Network or "DRPnet", is simple but very effective in recognizing different particle sizes, shapes, distributions and grayscale patterns corresponding to 2D views of 3D particles. Particles are detected by the first network, a fully convolutional regression network (FCRN), which maps the particle image to a continuous distance map that acts like a probability density function of particle centers. Particles identified by FCRN are further refined to reduce false particle detections by the second classification CNN. DRPnet's first CNN pretrained with only a single cryoEM dataset can be used to detect particles from different datasets without retraining. Compared to RELION template-based autopicking, DRPnet results in better particle picking performance with drastically reduced user interactions and processing time. DRPnet also outperforms the state-of-the-art particle picking networks in terms of the supervised detection evaluation metrics recall, precision, and F-measure. To further highlight quality of the picked particle sets, we compute and present additional performance metrics assessing the resulting 3D reconstructions such as number of 2D class averages, efficiency/angular coverage, Rosenthal-Henderson plots and local/global 3D reconstruction resolution.
conclusionDRPnet shows greatly improved time-savings to generate an initial particle dataset compared to manual picking, followed by template-based autopicking. Compared to other networks, DRPnet has equivalent or better performance. DRPnet excels on cryoEM datasets that have low contrast or clumped particles. Evaluating other performance metrics, DRPnet is useful for higher resolution 3D reconstructions with decreased particle numbers or unknown symmetry, detecting particles with better angular orientation coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.