Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33557280›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Facilitating Healthier Eating at Restaurants: A Multidisciplinary Scoping Review Comparing Strategies, Barriers, Motivators, and Outcomes by Restaurant Type and Initiator.

Melissa Fuster, Margaret A Handley, Tamara Alam, Lee Ann Fullington, Brian Elbel, Krishnendu Ray, Terry T-K Huang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Food Environment Assessment in Two Socioeconomic Contexts in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Design of theFrontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Melissa FusterDepartment of Health and Nutrition Science, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-9986
Margaret A HandleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Tamara AlamDepartment of Health and Nutrition Science, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11210, USA.
Lee Ann FullingtonLibrary, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11210, USA.
Brian ElbelDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, and Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Krishnendu RayDepartment of Nutrition and Food Studies, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Terry T-K HuangDepartment of Community Health and Social Sciences and Center for Systems and Community Design, City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5544-5187

Funding

NYU-CUNY Prevention Research CenterU48DP006396 · DP · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUANG, TERRY T-K, THORPE, LORNA · 2018 to 2023
$9.1M
Applying Innovative Approaches to Design and Implement an Intervention to Improve Cardiovascular Health in Hispanic/Latino communities through RestaurantsK01HL147882 · NHLBI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI FUSTER, MELISSA · 2019 to 2023
$800k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006396NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL147882NHLBI NIH HHS L60 HL154520NIH HHS K01HL147882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restaurants are understudied yet increasingly important food environment institutions for tackling diet-related diseases. This scoping review analyzes research and gray literature (n = 171 records) to assess which healthy eating promotion strategies have been implemented in restaurants and the associated motivations, barriers, and outcomes, compared by restaurant type (corporate/chain vs. independently owned restaurants) and initiator (restaurant-initiated vs. investigator-initiated). We found that the most commonly reported strategy was the increase of generally healthy offerings and the promotion of such offerings. Changes in food availability were more common among corporate restaurants and initiated by restaurants, while environmental facilitators were more commonly initiated by investigators and associated with independently owned restaurants. Aside from those associated with revenue, motivations and barriers for healthy eating promoting strategies varied by restaurant type. While corporate restaurants were also motivated by public health criticism, independently owned restaurants were motivated by interests to improve community health. Revenue concerns were followed by food sourcing issues in corporate restaurants and lack of interest among independently owned restaurants. Among reporting sources, most outcomes were revenue positive. This study shows the need for practice-based evidence and accounting for restaurant business models to tailor interventions and policies for sustained positive changes in these establishments.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyRestaurantsCommerceDietMotivationeating outfood environmentfood retailnutrition-related diseasesrestaurantscoping review

Identifiers

PMID33557280
PMCPMC7915132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.