Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33557060›Full record

ArticleDentistry journal2021

Use of Orthodontic Methods in the Treatment of Dental Luxations: A Scoping Review.

Enrico Spinas, Laura Pipi, Silvia Mezzena, Luca Giannetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Dentistry journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05305586 (Comparison of Bulk-fill Flowable and Packable Composite in Splinting of Luxation Injuries), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05305586 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Bulk-fill Flowable and Packable Composite in Splinting of Luxation Injuries: A Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDow University of Health SciencesRan2019 to 2020Enrolled88ConditionsDental Trauma, SplintsArmsSplint retained by Bulk-fill flowable, Splint retained by Packable Composite
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enrico SpinasDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sports Dental Research Center, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale, 40-09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4563-9804
Laura PipiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sports Dental Research Center, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale, 40-09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-4771
Silvia MezzenaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Cagliari, Via Ospedale, 40-09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Luca GiannettiDepartment of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo, 71-41124 Modena, Italy.
University of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Treating dental luxation injuries is challenging for the clinician. Dental luxations account for 18-33% of injuries to permanent teeth and can be addressed using different therapeutic approaches. The present work was conducted with two aims: (i) to evaluate, through a scoping review, current knowledge of the orthodontic methods (repositioning and stabilization splinting) that can be used at the time of the trauma, and (ii) to investigate the frequency and type of pulp consequences arising after these traumatic injuries. (2) Methods: The literature search was conducted in the period June 2020-December 2020 using the PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. The research questions were formulated according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) method and considered the following aspects: type of luxation injury and stage of root development; use of orthodontic repositioning and splinting techniques; frequency and type of pulp consequences; and compliance of treatments with international guidelines. (3) Results: The initial screening of the databases, using the selected search keywords, yielded a total of 587 articles, just 8 fully met the inclusion criteria. Closer analysis of these 8 publications revealed that they would not produce clear meta-analytical data. This made it necessary to limit the data collected to the following six items: number and type of injuries, initial therapeutic intervention, duration of follow-up, number, and type of different pulp consequences. (4) Conclusions: While orthodontic techniques are commonly used to treat dental intrusions, in the case of extrusive and lateral luxation injuries, they are less frequently used and the orthodontic approach is generally confined to the stabilization phase. Among the various possible pulp consequences, many authors consider only pulp canal obliteration (PCO) and pulp necrosis (PN), often tending to overlook physiological healing (pulp survival) and the possible development of PN after PCO. There is therefore a clear need for new, high-quality clinical studies of this topic based on systematic and standardized data collection.

Indexed as

luxation injuriespermanent teethphysiological healingpulp necrosisroot developmentsplinting technique

Identifiers

PMID33557060
PMCPMC7913869
OpenAlexW3128900435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.