Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33557029›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

How Canadian Oncologists Use Oncotype DX for Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients.

Xiaofu Zhu, Susan Dent, Lise Paquet, Tinghua Zhang, Daniel Tesolin, Nadine Graham, Olexiy Aseyev, Xinni Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence ScoreCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaofu ZhuThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Susan DentThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Lise PaquetDepartment of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada.
Tinghua ZhangOttawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada.
Daniel TesolinNorthern Ontario School of Medicine, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4373-4165
Nadine GrahamThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
Olexiy AseyevRegional Cancer Care Northwest, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6V4, Canada.
Xinni SongThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CACarleton University · CALakehead University · CAOttawa Hospital · CAThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe literature suggests that medical oncologists differ on how they use the Oncotype DX (ODX) genomic assay for making decisions about systemic therapy in breast cancer patients. Given the emergence of data supporting the use of genomic profiling for the prognosis and predicting benefit of chemotherapy, we surveyed medical oncologists in Canada to assess their usage and perception of the ODX assay.

methodsA 34-item survey was distributed to Canadian medical oncologists via the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. Data was collected on physician demographics, ODX usage patterns, and physicians' perception of the impact clinical and pathologic characteristics make on ODX utilization.

resultsResponse rate was 20.6% with 47 responses received from 228 survey sent. Forty-five responses were eligible for analysis. Sixty-two percent (28/45) of respondents treated predominantly breast cancer, and 60% (27/45) have been in practice for at least 10 years. The most cited reason for using ODX was to avoid giving patients unnecessary chemotherapy (64%; 29/45). Sixty-seven percent (30/45) deferred making treatment decisions until ODX testing was completed. Factors most strongly impacting ODX utilization included: patient request, medical comorbidities and tumor grade. In clinical scenarios, ODX was more frequently selected for patients aged 40-65 (vs. <40 or >65), grade 2 tumors (vs. grade 1 or 3), and Ki-67 index of 10-20% (vs. <10% or >20%).

conclusionsThis survey demonstrated that Canadian medical oncologists are preferentially using ODX to avoid giving patients unnecessary chemotherapy. The utilization of ODX is mainly in patients with intermediate clinical and pathologic features.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOncologistsCanadaChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansPrognosisbreast cancerclinicopathologic factorsOncotype DX

Identifiers

PMID33557029
PMCPMC7985759
OpenAlexW3126267106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.