Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33557026›Full record

ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Techniques for the Assessment of In Vitro and In Vivo Antifungal Combinations.

Anne-Laure Bidaud, Patrick Schwarz, Guillaume Herbreteau, Eric Dannaoui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Vitro Anti-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ethnomedicinal uses, phytochemistry, and biological properties ofJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Antibiofilm activity of terbinafine, itraconazole and their combination against Sporothrix brasiliensis yeast-like form's biofilms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  8. Surface Carrier Testing of Hospital Antiseptics AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification of efflux inhibitors through a drug repurposing strategy inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Antifungal Activities of Multi-Halogenated Indoles Against Drug-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antifungal effect of soilIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne-Laure BidaudParasitology-Mycology Unit, Microbiology Department, APHP, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris-Descartes University, F-75015 Paris, France.
Patrick SchwarzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstraße, D-35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-1865
Guillaume HerbreteauDepartment of Biochemistry, Nantes University Hospital, F-44093 Nantes, France.
Eric DannaouiParasitology-Mycology Unit, Microbiology Department, APHP, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris-Descartes University, F-75015 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2817-3830
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRPhilipps University of Marburg · DEUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic fungal infections are associated with high mortality rates despite adequate treatment. Moreover, acquired resistance to antifungals is increasing, which further complicates the therapeutic management. One strategy to overcome antifungal resistance is to use antifungal combinations. In vitro, several techniques are used to assess drug interactions, such as the broth microdilution checkerboard, agar-diffusion methods, and time-kill curves. Currently, the most widely used technique is the checkerboard method. The aim of all these techniques is to determine if the interaction between antifungal agents is synergistic, indifferent, or antagonistic. However, the interpretation of the results remains difficult. Several methods of analysis can be used, based on different theories. The most commonly used method is the calculation of the fractional inhibitory concentration index. Determination of the usefulness of combination treatments in patients needs well-conducted clinical trials, which are difficult. It is therefore important to study antifungal combinations in vivo, in experimental animal models of fungal infections. Although mammalian models have mostly been used, new alternative animal models in invertebrates look promising. To evaluate the antifungal efficacy, the most commonly used criteria are the mortality rate and the fungal load in the target organs.

Indexed as

agar diffusion assayantifungal combinationantifungal resistancecheckerboardgradient concentration striptime-kill curves

Identifiers

PMID33557026
PMCPMC7913650
OpenAlexW3126175474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.