ArticleBrain stimulation
Evidence of state-dependence in the effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation for seizure modulation.
Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early assessment of responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in China: A multicenter, self-controlled study.Chinese medical journal · 2025Trial
- A guide to neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsy.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Review
- Corticocortical evoked potential amplitude is altered by cortical stimulation in epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Nucleus-specific thalamic involvement in seizure networks differentiates neuromodulation outcomes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Virtual Responsive Neurostimulation Implantation: From Intracranial Connectivity to Optimized Lead Placement.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Adaptive neuromodulation dialogues: navigating current challenges and emerging innovations in neuromodulation system development.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- State-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation depend on seizure localization.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Hippocampal network activity forecasts epileptic seizures.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Current state of the epilepsy drug and device pipeline.Epilepsia · 2024Review
- Closed-loop stimulation in periods with less epileptiform activity drives improved epilepsy outcomes.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Closed-loop neurostimulation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Effective connectivity relates seizure outcome to electrode placement in responsive neurostimulation.Brain communications · 2024Article
- The present and future of seizure detection, prediction, and forecasting with machine learning, including the future impact on clinical trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Stimulation to probe, excite, and inhibit the epileptic brain.Epilepsia · 2023Article
- Unearthing the mechanisms of responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy.Communications medicine · 2023Review
- BAYESIAN NON-HOMOGENEOUS HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL WITH VARIABLE SELECTION FOR INVESTIGATING DRIVERS OF SEIZURE RISK CYCLING.The annals of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Future opportunities for research in rescue treatments.Epilepsia · 2022Review
- Patient-specific structural connectivity informs outcomes of responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2022Article
- Intracranial electroencephalographic biomarker predicts effective responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy prior to treatment.Epilepsia · 2022Article
- Network connectivity predicts effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation in focal epilepsy.Brain communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn implanted device for brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS® System) is approved as an effective treatment to reduce seizures in adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical trials of the RNS System demonstrate population-level reduction in average seizure frequency, but therapeutic response is highly variable. HYPOTHESIS: Recent evidence links seizures to cyclical fluctuations in underlying risk. We tested the hypothesis that effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation varies based on current state within cyclical risk fluctuations.
methodsWe analyzed retrospective data from 25 adults with medically-refractory focal epilepsy implanted with the RNS System. Chronic electrocorticography was used to record electrographic seizures, and hidden Markov models decoded seizures into fluctuations in underlying risk. State-dependent associations of RNS System stimulation parameters with changes in risk were estimated.
resultsHigher charge density was associated with improved outcomes, both for remaining in a low seizure risk state and for transitioning from a high to a low seizure risk state. The effect of stimulation frequency depended on initial seizure risk state: when starting in a low risk state, higher stimulation frequencies were associated with remaining in a low risk state, but when starting in a high risk state, lower stimulation frequencies were associated with transition to a low risk state. Findings were consistent across bipolar and monopolar stimulation configurations.
conclusionThe impact of RNS on seizure frequency exhibits state-dependence, such that stimulation parameters which are effective in one seizure risk state may not be effective in another. These findings represent conceptual advances in understanding the therapeutic mechanism of RNS, and directly inform current practices of RNS tuning and the development of next-generation neurostimulation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.