ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2021
A Stakeholder-Driven Qualitative Study to Define High Quality End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Current State of Palliative Care Research for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Thematic Analysis of Empirical Literature.Psycho-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- How are agency and autonomy understood in children's palliative and end-of-life care?: A narrative review.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Review
- Preparing for a Child's End of Life: Parent Perspectives.Pediatrics · 2025Article
- Care needs of children with chronic illnesses from the perspectives of children, parents, and nurses: a Q methodology approach.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Pediatric Oncology Hospice: A Comprehensive Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024Review
- Harnessing Natural Language Processing to Assess Quality of End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Barriers to Pediatric Palliative Care: Trainee and Faculty Perspectives Across Two Academic Centers.Journal of palliative medicine · 2023Article
- Parent Priorities in End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Measuring Pediatric Palliative Care Quality: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2023Article
- Article
- End-of-life care quality for children with cancer who receive palliative care.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2022Article
- Shifting and intersecting needs: Parents' experiences during and following the withdrawal of life sustaining treatments in the paediatric intensive care unit.Intensive & critical care nursing · 2022Article
- Refining Patient-Centered Measures of End-of-Life Care Quality for Children With Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2022Article
- Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Specialized Pediatric Palliative Care Services in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Centers.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The End-of-Life Wishes and Preferences of Adolescents with Cancer: A Scoping Review.Palliative medicine reportsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextAmong adults with cancer, measures for high quality end-of-life care (EOLC) include avoidance of hospitalizations near end of life. For children with cancer, no measures exist to evaluate or improve EOLC, and adult quality measures may not apply.
objectiveWe engaged key stakeholders to explore EOLC priorities for children with cancer and their families, and to examine relevance of existing adult EOLC quality measures for children with cancer.
methodsIn a multicenter qualitative study, we conducted interviews and focus groups with: adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with advanced cancer, parents of children with advanced cancer, bereaved parents, and interdisciplinary healthcare professionals. We transcribed, coded, and employed thematic analysis to summarize findings.
resultsWe enrolled 54 stakeholders (25 parents [including 12 bereaved parents], 10 AYAs, and 19 healthcare professionals). Participants uniformly prioritized direct communication with children about preferences and prognosis, interdisciplinary care, symptom management, and honoring family preference for location of death. Many participants valued access to the emergency department or hospital for symptom management or supportive care, which diverges from measures for high quality EOLC in adults. Most wished to avoid mechanical ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Notably, participants generally valued hospice; however, few understood hospice care or had utilized its services.
conclusionChildhood cancer stakeholders define high quality EOLC primarily through person-centered measures, characterizing half of existing adult-focused measures as limited in relevance to children. Future research should focus on developing techniques for person-centered quality measurement to capture attributes of greatest importance to children with cancer and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.