Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33556074›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Genetic diversity of native and cultivated Ugandan Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner): Climate influences, breeding potential and diversity conservation.

Catherine Kiwuka, Eva Goudsmit, Rémi Tournebize, Sinara Oliveira de Aquino, Jacob C Douma, Laurence Bellanger, Dominique Crouzillat, Piet Stoffelen, Ucu Sumirat, Hyacinthe Legnaté and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutritional Efficiency ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic improvement of robusta coffee (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Catherine KiwukaDepartment of Plant Sciences, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eva GoudsmitDepartment of Plant Sciences, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Rémi TournebizeIRD-UMR DIADE (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD), Montpellier, France.
Sinara Oliveira de AquinoIRD-UMR DIADE (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD), Montpellier, France.
Jacob C DoumaDepartment of Plant Sciences, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Laurence BellangerNestlé Research, Tours, France.
Dominique CrouzillatNestlé Research, Tours, France.
Piet StoffelenMeise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium.
Ucu SumiratICCRI, Jember, Indonesia.
Hyacinthe LegnatéCNRA, Divo, Côte d'Ivoire.
Pierre MarracciniInstitute of Agricultural Genetics (AGI)-LMI RICE2, CIRAD-UMR IPME (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD), Hanoi, Vietnam.
Alexandre de KochkoIRD-UMR DIADE (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD), Montpellier, France.
Alan Carvalho AndradeEMBRAPA Coffee-INOVACAFE, Lavras, Brazil.
John Wasswa MulumbaNational Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Entebbe, Uganda.
Pascal MusoliNational Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), Entebbe, Uganda.
Niels P R AntenDepartment of Plant Sciences, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Valérie PoncetIRD-UMR DIADE (Univ. Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD), Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-2846
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRNational Agricultural Research Organisation · UGWageningen University & Research · NLNestlé (France) · FRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRCentre National de Recherche Agronomique · CIIndonesian Coffee and Cocoa Research Institute · IDMeise Botanic Garden · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild genetic resources and their ability to adapt to environmental change are critically important in light of the projected climate change, while constituting the foundation of agricultural sustainability. To address the expected negative effects of climate change on Robusta coffee trees (Coffea canephora), collecting missions were conducted to explore its current native distribution in Uganda over a broad climatic range. Wild material from seven forests could thus be collected. We used 19 microsatellite (SSR) markers to assess genetic diversity and structure of this material as well as material from two ex-situ collections and a feral population. The Ugandan C. canephora diversity was then positioned relative to the species' global diversity structure. Twenty-two climatic variables were used to explore variations in climatic zones across the sampled forests. Overall, Uganda's native C. canephora diversity differs from other known genetic groups of this species. In northwestern (NW) Uganda, four distinct genetic clusters were distinguished being from Zoka, Budongo, Itwara and Kibale forests A large southern-central (SC) cluster included Malabigambo, Mabira, and Kalangala forest accessions, as well as feral and cultivated accessions, suggesting similarity in genetic origin and strong gene flow between wild and cultivated compartments. We also confirmed the introduction of Congolese varieties into the SC region where most Robusta coffee production takes place. Identified populations occurred in divergent environmental conditions and 12 environmental variables significantly explained 16.3% of the total allelic variation across populations. The substantial genetic variation within and between Ugandan populations with different climatic envelopes might contain adaptive diversity to cope with climate change. The accessions that we collected have substantially enriched the diversity hosted in the Ugandan collections and thus contribute to ex situ conservation of this vital genetic resource. However, there is an urgent need to develop strategies to enhance complementary in-situ conservation of Coffea canephora in native forests in northwestern Uganda.

Indexed as

ClimateConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetic VariationPlant BreedingCoffea

Identifiers

PMID33556074
PMCPMC7870046
OpenAlexW3128663616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.