ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Evaluation of limited hand mobility in systemic sclerosis patients by using "prayer sign" and "tabletop sign".
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positive Prayer Sign in Tophaceous Gout.European journal of rheumatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine limited joint mobility (LJM) of the hand in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
methodsLJM was evaluated with "prayer sign" and "tabletop sign" tests. LJM staging was done by Rosenbloom classification method. LJM (+) and LJM (-) patients were compared in terms of demographic findings (gender, age and duration of disease), laboratory results (ESR, CRP, anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-topoisomerase I and anti-centromere), and modified Rodnan skin score (mRss) results.
resultsIn our study, a total of 217 patients, including 113 patients with a diagnosis of SSc, and 104 as a healthy control group with similar age and gender distribution to these patients, were included. A total of 113 (F=98, M=15) patients (limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc=71), diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc=42)) were included in this study and LJM positivity was found in 66.4% (lcSSc=38, dcSSc=37). A statistically significant difference was observed in between lcSSc and dcSSc patients according to the presence of LJM (p<0.001). There was a moderate positivity relationship between LJM and mRss (lcSSc r=0.449, p<0.001; dcSSc r=0.565, p<0.001).
conclusionsIn our study, it was found that LJM staging correlated with mRss and dcSSc patients had more severe LJM findings than lcSSc. We conclude that "prayer sign" and "tabletop sign" tests used in hand evaluation in SSc patients have similar clinical results with mRss and can be simple bedside tests in daily practice. Key Points • This is the first study examining limited joint mobility (LJM) with "prayer sign" and "tabletop sign" tests in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. • "Prayer sign" and "tabletop sign" tests can be easily performed in daily practice. • We found Rosenbloom LJM staging correlated with modified Rodnan skin score. LJM of the hand can be a good prognostic indicator for early stage SSc patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.