ArticleBrain structure & function2021
Occupation-related effects on motor cortex thickness among older, cognitive healthy individuals.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cortical Structure Alterations in Young People With Mild Internet Gaming Disorder.Addiction biology · 2026Article
- Observational
- ChatGPT-estimated occupational complexity predicts cognitive outcomes and cortical thickness above and beyond socioeconomic status among older adults.GeroScience · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Relationship between lifestyle proxies of cognitive reserve and cortical regions in older adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study of altered functional brain activity in cardiac arrest survivors with good neurological outcome.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Hippocampal Volumetric Software Applications: Do All Roads Lead to Rome?Biomedicines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Both, decline of sensorimotor functions and cortical thickness are known processes in healthy aging. Physical activity has been suggested to enhance the execution of daily routine activities and to extend the time of functional independence in advanced age. We hypothesized that cortical thickness of motor areas in retired individuals could be related to physical demands of the profession carried out during working life. Depending on their former occupations, 69 cognitively healthy individuals (range 70-85 years) were divided into higher and lower physically complex occupations (HPCO n = 27 and LPCO n = 42) according to the international standard classification of occupations (ISCO-08). Participants underwent a high-resolution 3T T1-weighted MRI scan. Surface-based analysis revealed higher cortical thickness in the left precentral (P = 0.001) and postcentral gyrus (P < 0.001) and right postcentral gyrus (P = 0.001) for the HPCO relative to the LPCO group (corrected for multiple comparisons, sex, age and leisure activities in the past 20 years). Physical leisure activities associated with exertion were positively correlated with cortical thickness in the left pre- and postcentral gyrus (P = 0.037) of the LPCO group. Time since retirement was negatively associated with cortical thickness in the left postcentral gyrus (P = 0.004) of the HPCO group. Executing a higher physically complex occupation before retirement was related to relative higher cortical thickness in the primary motor and somatosensory cortex in later life, supporting the hypothesis that physical activity contributes to neural reserve in these regions. However, these benefits appear to vanish when physical activity is reduced due to retirement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.