ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021
Differences in surgical outcome between petroclival meningioma and anterior petrous meningioma.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for petroclival meningiomas: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Morphometric analysis of the abducens nerve in the petroclival region.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical characteristics of petroclival meningioma and the impact of resection degree on its prognosis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPetroclival meningiomas (PC MNGs) and anterior petrous meningiomas (AP MNGs) have similar locations. However, these are different tumors clearly divided by the trigeminal nerve. There has never been a study on the comparison of the surgical outcomes of these two meningiomas. In this study, we compared and analyzed the surgical outcome of PC MNGs and AP MNGs.
methodsThe charts of 85 patients diagnosed with PC MNGs of AP MNGs who underwent surgical treatment were retrospectively reviewed. And we analyzed the characteristics of 49 PC MNGs (57.6%) and compared them with those of 36 AP MNGs.
resultsPreoperative brainstem edema was observed in 11 patients (22.4%) of the PC MNG group and 1 patient (2.8%) of the AP MNG group (p = 0.024). Total tumor removal was achieved in 21 patients (58.3%) of the AP MNG group, but only 17 patients (34.7%) of the PC MNG group were able to completely (p = 0.047). In addition, sixth cranial nerve palsy occurred in 17 patients (34.7%) of the PC MNG group and 4 patients (11.1%) of the AP MNG group (p = 0.025).
conclusionsIn this study, we found that PC MNGs has a worse surgical outcome than AP MNGs, because PC MNGs were difficult to completely remove and were more likely to damage abducens nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.