ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021
Metagenomic insights into the effect of sulfate on enhanced biological phosphorus removal.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bacterial community and filamentous population of industrial wastewater treatment plants in Belgium.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Wastewater Treatment with Bacterial Representatives of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Microbial diversity in shallow-sea sediment from Tsukumo Bay, Japan, determined by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.Microbiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- A quantitative sequencing method using synthetic internal standards including functional and phylogenetic marker genes.Environmental microbiology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Excess phosphorus in water supplies causes eutrophication, which degrades water quality. Hence, the efficient removal of phosphorus from wastewater represents a highly desirable process. Here, we evaluated the effect of sulfate concentration on enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR), in which phosphorus is typically removed under anaerobic-oxic cycles, with sulfate reduction the predominant process in the anaerobic phase. Two sequencing batch EBPR reactors operated under high- (SBR-H) vs. low-sulfate (SBR-L) concentrations for 189 days and under three periods, i.e., start-up, sufficient acetate, and limited acetate. Under acetate-rich conditions, phosphorus removal efficiency was > 90% for both reactors; however, under acetate-limited conditions, only 34% and 91.3% of the phosphorus were removed for the SBR-L and the SBR-H, respectively. Metagenomic sequencing of the reactors showed that the relative abundance of the polyphosphate-accumulating and sulfur-reducing bacteria (SRB) was higher in the SBR-H, consistent with its higher phosphorus removal activity. Ten high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes, including one closely related to the genus Thiothrix disciformis (99.81% average amino acid identity), were recovered and predicted to simultaneously metabolize phosphorus and sulfur by the presence of phosphorus (ppk, ppx, pst, and pit) and sulfur (sul, sox, dsr, sqr, apr, cys, and sat) metabolism marker genes. The omics-based analysis provided a holistic view of the microbial ecosystem in the EBPR process and revealed that SRB and Thiothrix play key roles in the presence of high sulfate.Key points• We observed high phosphorus-removal efficiency in high-sulfate EBPR.• Metagenome-based analysis revealed sulfate-related metabolic mechanisms in EBPR.• SRB and PAOs showed interrelationships in the EBPR-sulfur systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.