ArticleJournal of vision2020
Orientation of the preferred retinal locus (PRL) is maintained following changes in simulated scotoma size.
Article in Journal of vision, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulating Macular Degeneration to Investigate Activities of Daily Living: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- Assessing structure - Function relationships in non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Experimental eye research · 2025Review
- Long Term Visual Outcomes of an Extended Macular Vision IOL in Eyes with Macular Disease and Visually Insignificant Cataract.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Training With Simulated Scotoma Leads to Behavioral Improvements Through at Least Two Distinct Mechanisms.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- A gaze-contingent saccadic re-referencing training with simulated central vision loss.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Perspective on Vision Science-Informed Interventions for Central Vision Loss.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Saccade Landing Point Prediction Based on Fine-Grained Learning Method.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although macular lesions often enlarge, we know little about what happens when the preferred retinal locus (PRL) is enveloped by the lesion. We present a prospective study of subjects with normal vision who were trained to develop a PRL using simulated scotomas with a gaze-contingent visual display. We hypothesized that, when subjects had developed a robust PRL and the scotoma size was increased, the PRL would move to remain outside the scotoma and in a direction that maintained the orientation (theta) of the PRL relative to the fovea. Nine subjects with normal vision were trained to develop a PRL and were then exposed to scotoma sizes that ranged from 4° to 24° in diameter. Subjects tracked a stimulus using saccades or smooth pursuits. Fixation stability was measured by calculating the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). To measure the reassignment of the oculomotor reference (OMR) to the PRL, we analyzed the spread (BCEA) of saccade first landing points. All subjects developed a robust PRL that did not vary more than 0.8° on average between blocks of trials of a scotoma size, and they maintained the orientation of the PRL as the simulated scotoma size varied (±9° median standard deviation in theta, defined as orientation angle). Fixation stability and OMR to the PRL worsened (larger BCEA) with increasing scotoma size. This, and related studies, could guide development of a PRL training method to help people with central vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.