Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33555122›Full record

ArticleWorldviews on evidence-based nursing2021

Evaluation of the Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Extubation of Critically Ill Adults: An Interprofessional Survey.

Michele C Balas, Judith Tate, Alai Tan, Brennon Pinion, Matthew Exline

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Worldviews on evidence-based nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Perspectives of intensive care professionals on extubation practices, causes of delays, and proposed solutions: A cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Investigating Why Clinicians Deviate from Standards of Care: Liberating Patients from Mechanical Ventilation in the ICU.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michele C BalasCollege of Nursing, Center for Healthy Aging, Self-Management, and Complex Care, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4009-864X
Judith TateCollege of Nursing, Center for Healthy Aging, Self-Management, and Complex Care, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-419X
Alai TanCollege of Nursing, Center for Research and Health Analytics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-9088
Brennon PinionMedical Intensive Care Unit, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Matthew ExlineDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-158X
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Determinants of Implementation Success Coordinating Ventilator, Early Ambulation and Rehabilitation Efforts in the ICU (DISCOVER-ICU) studyR01HL146781 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BALAS, MICHELE CHRISTINA, MION, LORRAINE C · 2019 to 2021
$1.3M
A Problem Solving Intervention for Post-ICU Cognitive Impairment in Older AdultsR03AG063276 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TATE, JUDITH ANN · 2019 to 2020
$312k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146781NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL146781NIA NIH HHS R03 AG063276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are an evidence-based way of identifying patients ready for mechanical ventilation (MV) liberation. Despite their effectiveness, global SBT performance rates remain suboptimal, and many patients who demonstrate the ability to breathe on their own remain on MV. The factors that influence clinicians' decision to discontinue MV following a successful SBT remain unclear.

aimsThe aim of this study was to explore the underlying causes of extubation delays in the intensive care unit (ICU) from an interprofessional perspective.

methodsAn exploratory, descriptive, cross-sectional design was used. An online survey was administered in December 2019 to clinicians practicing in three ICUs at a single medical center in the U.S. Survey questions focused on clinicians' perceptions of current MV liberation practices and perceived barriers or facilitators to timely extubation after a successful SBT.

resultsOf 425 eligible clinicians, 135 completed the survey (31.7% response rate). The majority of clinicians believed the current SBT and extubation process took too long (n = 108; 80.0%) and that this delay negatively affected patient outcomes. While professional groups differed in their rankings of importance, factors perceived to contribute to extubation delays most commonly included SBT timing, low provider confidence levels in making extubation decisions, and patient-specific factors. Potential strategies to overcome these barriers included developing an automated extubation protocol, performing SBTs when the provider responsible for final extubation decisions is physically present, and decreasing clinician perception of reprimand or condemnation for failed extubations. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: The MV liberation process is complex and dependent on the decisions of various ICU professionals. Clinicians perceive a number of potentially modifiable provider- and organizational-level factors that cause extubation delays in everyday practice. Understanding and addressing these barriers is essential for improving ICU quality and patient outcomes. Future research should explore the effect of nurse and respiratory therapist-driven extubation protocols on MV liberation rates.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAdultAirway ExtubationCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedOhioSurveys and QuestionnairesVentilator Weaningbarriers and facilitatorsevidence-based practiceextubationimplementation scienceintensive care unitinterprofessionalmechanical ventilationquality improvementspontaneous breathing trialssurvey

Identifiers

PMID33555122
PMCPMC8195826
OpenAlexW3127714806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.