Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33555119›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2021

An efficient cephalosporin stewardship programme in French swine production.

Fabien Verliat, Anne Hemonic, Sylvie Chouet, Philippe Le Coz, Mélanie Liber, Eric Jouy, Agnès Perrin-Guyomard, Anne Chevance, Didier Delzescaux, Claire Chauvin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact ofVeterinary and animal science · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabien VerliatFrench interprofessional pork organisation (INAPORC), Paris, France.
Anne HemonicFrench Pork and Pig Institute (IFIP), Le Rheu, France.
Sylvie ChouetAssociation of Swine Veterinarians (AFMVP), Toulouse, France.
Philippe Le CozNational Society of Veterinary Technical Groups (SNGTV), Paris, France.
Mélanie LiberAssociation of veterinarians practising in animal production (AVPO), Rennes, France.
Eric JouyFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory Ploufragan, Ploufragan, France.
Agnès Perrin-GuyomardFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Fougères Laboratory, Javené, France.
Anne ChevanceFrench Agency for Veterinary Medicinal Products (ANSES-ANMV), Fougères, France.
Didier DelzescauxFrench interprofessional pork organisation (INAPORC), Paris, France.
Claire ChauvinFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort Laboratory Ploufragan, Ploufragan, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4837-4418
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse · FRInstitut du Porc · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By 2010, systems set up to monitor the antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial usage identified a sustained increase regarding third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin resistance in French pig production. This sector mobilised and collectively committed to responsible action in the following months. This led to a multi-professional voluntary stewardship programme that was started in 2011. A consensus of veterinary opinion led to the definition of restrictive rules on the prescription of the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins targeted by the antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). All pig sector professionals, including farmers, were informed. Existing monitoring systems for usage and resistance were supplemented by data from the records of veterinarians' cephalosporin deliveries and from individual pig farm surveys investigating antimicrobial usage. The second step, from 2014, entailed regulatory measures that consolidated the programme by setting quantitative reduction objectives and specifying the terms and conditions for prescribing and dispensing a list of critical antimicrobial molecules including cephalosporins. All the data sources confirmed a significant fall of more than 90% in cephalosporin usage in the French pig production sector between 2010 and 2016. Monitoring systems recorded that the resistance of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates also tended to decrease over the same period. The stewardship programme proved highly effective in reducing usage and containing resistance, illustrating the efficiency of a well-defined multi-professional strategy.

Indexed as

Sus scrofaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCephalosporinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleFrancePrevalenceSwineSwine DiseasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsantimicrobial stewardshipcephalosporin resistanceEscherichia coliOne Health

Identifiers

PMID33555119
PMCPMC8025622
OpenAlexW3128018522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.