Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33555095›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Testing and Actionable Findings in Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Gehan Botrus, Heidi Kosirorek, Mohamad Bassam Sonbol, Yael Kusne, Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior, Mitesh J Borad, Daniel H Ahn, Pashtoon M Kasi, Leylah M Drusbosky, Hiba Dada and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Identification of Candidate Alterations Mediating KRASG12C Inhibitor Resistance in Advanced Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Expert consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology on the determination of biomarkers in pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the Clinical Utility of Pancreatic Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gehan BotrusMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Heidi KosirorekMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Mohamad Bassam SonbolMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Yael KusneMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson JuniorMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Mitesh J BoradMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Daniel H AhnMayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Pashtoon M KasiDivision of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Leylah M DrusboskyGuardant Health, Inc, Redwood City, California, USA.
Hiba DadaGuardant Health, Inc, Redwood City, California, USA.
Phani Keerthi SurapaneniMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Jason StarrMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Ashton RitterMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Jessica McMillanMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Natasha WylieMayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Kabir Mody *Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Tanios S Bekaii-Saab *Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USGuardant (United States) · USJacksonville College · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent advances in molecular diagnostic technologies allow for the evaluation of solid tumor malignancies through noninvasive blood sampling, including circulating tumor DNA profiling (ctDNA). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, often because of late presentation of disease. Diagnosis is often made using endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which often does not yield enough tissue for next-generation sequencing. With this study, we sought to characterize the ctDNA genomic alteration landscape in patients with advanced PDAC with a focus on actionable findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom December 2014 through October 2019, 357 samples collected from 282 patients with PDAC at Mayo Clinic underwent ctDNA testing using a clinically available assay. The majority of samples were tested using the 73-gene panel which includes somatic genomic targets, including complete or critical exon coverage in 30 and 40 genes, respectively, and in some, amplifications, fusions, and indels. Clinical data and outcome variables were available for 165 patients; with 104 patients at initial presentation.

resultsAll patients included in this study had locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Samples having at least one alteration, when variants of unknown significance (VUS) were excluded, numbered 266 (75%). After excluding VUS, therapeutically relevant alterations were observed in 170 (48%) of the total 357 cohort, including KRAS (G12C), EGFR, ATM, MYC, BRCA, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations. KRAS, SMAD, CCND2, or TP53 alterations were seen in higher frequency in patients with advanced disease.

conclusionOur study is the largest cohort to date that demonstrates the feasibility of ctDNA testing in PDAC. We provide a benchmark landscape upon which the field can continue to grow. Future applications may include use of ctDNA to guide treatment and serial monitoring of ctDNA during disease course to identify novel therapeutic targets for improved prognosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis often due to late presentation of disease. Biopsy tissue sampling is invasive and samples are often inadequate, requiring repeated invasive procedures and delays in treatment. Noninvasive methods to identify PDAC early in its course may improve prognosis in PDAC. Using ctDNA, targetable genes can be identified and used for treatment.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCirculating Tumor DNAPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAAdvancedct-DNAPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID33555095
PMCPMC8265372
OpenAlexW3126245113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.