Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33554969›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2021

R-Loop Analysis by Dot-Blot.

Prisila Ramirez, Robert J Crouch, Vivian G Cheung, Christopher Grunseich

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms underlining R-loop biology and implications for human disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. YIPF2 regulates genome integrity.Cell & bioscience · 2024
    Article
  13. CircR-loop: a novel RNA:DNA interaction on genome instability.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Prisila RamirezLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Robert J CrouchEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
Vivian G CheungLife Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Christopher GrunseichNeurogenetics Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health; christopher.grunseich@nih.gov.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Studies of Hereditary Neurological Disease: Disease MechanismsZIANS003038 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI FISCHBECK, KENNETH · 2009 to 2023
$19.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three-stranded nucleic acid structure, R-loop, is increasingly recognized for its role in gene regulation. Initially, R-loops were thought to be the by-products of transcription; but recent findings of fewer R-loops in diseased cells made it clear that R-loops have functional roles in a variety of human cells. Next, it is critical to understand the roles of R-loops and how cells balance their abundance. A challenge in the field is the quantitation of R-loops since much of the work relies on the S9.6 monoclonal antibody whose specificity for RNA-DNA hybrids has been questioned. Here, we use dot-blots with the S9.6 antibody to quantify R-loops and show the sensitivity and specificity of this assay with RNase H, RNase T1, and RNase III that cleave RNA-DNA hybrids, single-stranded RNA, and double-stranded RNA, respectively. This method is highly reproducible, uses general laboratory equipment and reagents, and provides results within two days. This assay can be used in research and clinical settings to quantify R-loops and assess the effect of mutations in genes such as senataxin on R-loop abundance.

Indexed as

ImmunoblottingR-Loop StructuresAntibodiesDNAFibroblastsHumansNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesOligonucleotidesRibonuclease HRibonucleasesRNAAntibodiesDNANucleic Acid HeteroduplexesOligonucleotidesRibonuclease HRibonucleasesRNA

Identifiers

PMID33554969
PMCPMC8506650
OpenAlexW3124736967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.