SynthesisDeveloping world bioethics2021
The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador.
Synthesis in Developing world bioethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador.Developing world bioethics · 2021Pooled it
- Adapting research ethics for global health crises: a systematic analysis of COVID-19 pandemic research guidelines and reflections on their post-pandemic implications.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the first standardized registry of approved research studies by the research ethics committees in Ecuador.BMC medical ethics · 2025Observational
- The state of cancer research and its association with the cancer burden in Ecuador: a bibliometric study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring views of South African research ethics committees on pandemic preparedness and response during COVID-19.Research ethics · 2024Article
- A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- One hundred years of Ecuadorian biomedical scientific output and its association with the main causes of mortality: a bibliometric study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- A Survey on Methodological Issues of Clinical Research Studies Reviewed by Independent Ethic Committees during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- COVID-19 research in LMICs.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Article
- A Call for Better, Not Faster, Research Ethics Committee Reviews in the Covid-19 Era.Ethics & human research · 2021Article
- In response to "The negative impact of ad hoc committees for ethical evaluation: The case of COVID-19-related research in Ecuador".Developing world bioethics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.