Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33554436›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2021

Impact of COVID-19 on wound care in Germany.

Justin Gabriel Schlager, Benjamin Kendziora, Leilah Patzak, Sophie Kupf, Christoph Rothenberger, Zeno Fiocco, Lars E French, Markus Reinholz, Daniela Hartmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia and wound care.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Review
  9. Impact of COVID-19 on wound care in Germany.International wound journal · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin Gabriel SchlagerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin KendzioraDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Leilah PatzakDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sophie KupfDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph RothenbergerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Zeno FioccoDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars E FrenchDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus ReinholzDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniela HartmannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies showed that the COVID-19 pandemic caused collateral damage in health care in terms of reduced hospital submissions or postponed treatment of other acute or chronic ill patients. An anonymous survey was sent out by mail to patients with chronic wounds in order to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on wound care. Sixty-three patients returned the survey. In 14%, diagnostic workup or hospitalisation was cancelled or postponed. Thirty-six percent could not seek consultation by their primary care physician as usual. The use of public transport or long travel time was not related to limited access to medical service (P = .583). In ambulatory care, there was neither a significant difference in the frequency of changing wound dressings (P = .67), nor in the person, who performed wound care (P = .39). There were no significant changes in wound-specific quality of life (P = .505). No patient used telemedicine in order to avoid face-to-face contact or anticipate to pandemic-related restrictions. The COVID-19 pandemic impaired access to clinical management of chronic wounds in Germany. It had no significant impact on ambulatory care or wound-related quality of life. Telemedicine still plays a negligible role in wound care.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeWounds and InjuriesCOVID-19leg ulcerquality of lifetelemedicinewounds

Identifiers

PMID33554436
PMCPMC8014846
OpenAlexW3128024203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.