Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33554428›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2021

Hypertension-mediated organ damage regression associates with blood pressure variability improvement three years after successful treatment initiation in essential hypertension.

Helen Triantafyllidi, Dimitrios Benas, Antonios Schoinas, Dionyssia Birmpa, Paraskevi Trivilou, Efthimia Varytimiadi, Dimitrios Voutsinos, Ignatios Ikonomidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Blood pressure variability: a review.Journal of hypertension · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Blood pressure variability and target organ damage regression in hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helen Triantafyllidi2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-1214
Dimitrios Benas2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Antonios Schoinas2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Dionyssia Birmpa2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Paraskevi Trivilou2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Efthimia Varytimiadi2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios Voutsinos2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ignatios Ikonomidis2nd Department of Cardiology Medical School, University of Athens, ATTIKON Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with the development, progression, and severity of cardiovascular (CV) organ damage and an increased risk of CV morbidity and mortality. We aimed to explore any association between short-term BPV reduction and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) regression in hypertensive patients 3-year post-treatment initiation regarding BP control. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24 h ABPM) was performed at baseline in 180 newly diagnosed and never-treated hypertensive patients. We measured 24 h average systolic (24 h SBP) and diastolic BP (24 h DBP) as well as 24 h systolic (sBPV) and diastolic BPV (dBPV). Patients were initially evaluated and 3 years later regarding arterial stiffness (PWV), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), 24 h microalbumin levels (MAU), and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Successful BP treatment was defined as 24 h SBP/DBP < 130/80 mm Hg based on 2nd ABPM and subsequently, patients were characterized as controlled (n = 119, age = 53 ± 11 years) or non-controlled (n = 61, age = 47 ± 11 years) regarding their BP levels. In the whole population and the controlled group, 24 h SBP/DBP, sBPV/dBPV, LVMI, and IMT were decreased. Additionally, LVMI improvement was related with both sBPV (p < .001) and dBPV reduction (r = .18, p = .02 and r = .20, p = .03, respectively). In non-controlled hypertensives, PWV was increased. In multiple linear regression analysis, sBPV and dBPV reduction predicted LVMI improvement in total population and controlled group independently of initial office SBP, mean BP, and 24 h-SBP levels. In middle-aged hypertensive patients, a 3-year antihypertensive treatment within normal BP limits, confirmed by 24-h ABPM, leads to CV risk reduction associated with sBPV and dBPV improvement.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAdultBlood PressureCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessEssential HypertensionHumansMiddle Aged24 h ambulatory blood pressure measurementarterial hypertensionblood pressure variabilityhypertension-mediated organ damage

Identifiers

PMID33554428
PMCPMC8678708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.