ArticleSTAR protocols2021
Protocol for quantitative assessment of social cooperation in mice.
Article in STAR protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complex social dominance behavior using a novel platform test is associated with lateral habenula activation in male and female mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
- A Novel Cooperative Behavior Assay in Rats Reveals Distinct Social Coordination Strategies of Increasing Complexity and Social Reciprocity Deficits in a Model of Fragile X Syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Designing animal-friendly behavioral tests for neuroscience research: The importance of an ethological approach.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social cooperation in rodents was recently validated in rats, and we recently successfully applied a modified automated analysis to mice. Here, we describe a detailed procedure for using this paradigm in mice that relies on reward-based mutual communication that is automatically detected by a software algorithm embedded in the custom-made equipment. We also describe exemplary results of analyses in mice as a guide to broader neuroscience research applications employing transgenic knockout mice modeling neuropsychiatric disorders and mice of various ages. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Han et al. (2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.