Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33554031›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2021

Momentary Induction of Inhibitory Control and Its Effects on Uncertainty.

Omer Linkovski, Carolyn I Rodriguez, Michael G Wheaton, Avishai Henik, Gideon E Anholt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omer LinkovskiDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7765-4414
Carolyn I RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical C, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6697-1692
Michael G WheatonDepartment of Psychology, Barnard College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7465-7879
Avishai HenikDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-6004
Gideon E AnholtDepartment of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5128-239X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deficient inhibitory control and difficulty resolving uncertainty are central in psychopathology. How these factors interact remains unclear. Initial evidence suggests that inducing inhibitory control improves resolution of uncertainty. This may occur only when participants overcome action tendencies, which are dominant tendencies to perform certain behaviors. Our study explored the links between inhibitory control and behavioral responses to uncertainty while manipulating action-tendencies' strength. In three experiments, 132 undergraduates completed a task that combined induction of momentary changes in inhibitory control level (Stroop task), with responses to uncertainty (visual-search task). We manipulated action-tendencies' strength by varying uncertainty proportions across experiments. Results indicated that momentary induction of inhibitory control improved resolution of high-uncertainty during mostly low-uncertainty trials but hampered resolution of low-uncertainty during mostly high-uncertainty trials. Identical inhibitory control induction did not affect resolution of uncertainty when uncertainty conditions were equalized. Participants' subjective uncertainty measures were similar across experiments. Our results suggest that momentary inhibitory control induction modifies behavioral responses to uncertainty and selectively affects trials that require overcoming dominant action tendencies. These findings indicate a potentially unique and multifaceted relationship between inhibitory control and behavioral responses to uncertainty. Clinical implications for models of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and experimental implications to post-conflict processes are discussed.

Indexed as

action tendenciescompulsionsinhibitory controlObsessive-Compulsive DisorderStroop taskuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID33554031
PMCPMC7824980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.