Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33553892›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

NMF-Based Spectral Deconvolution with a Web Platform GC Mixture Touch.

Yasuyuki Zushi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuyuki ZushiResearch Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaragi 305-8506, Japan.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete separation of chemicals in a complex mixture is far from being achieved even with the current high-performance separation technology, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Several deconvolution techniques based on multivariate curve resolution (MCR), or model peak methods, which are represented by AMDIS, have been developed to address the above-mentioned issue. The model peak methods have been developed to provide easy-to-use tools, including AMDIS, but are limited for MCR with approximation methods. The objective of this study was to provide an easy-to-use deconvolution tool based on the MCR approach for GC-MS data. The spectral deconvolution tool based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), which calculates outputs using an approximation method, was implemented as a free web platform, namely, GC Mixture Touch, clarifying the effects of the parameters required for the deconvolution. The GC Mixture Touch was applied to the actual mixture sample of road dust spiked with chemical standards. The recommended parameter settings for smoothing of the chromatogram, the number of ranks, and the NMF algorithm for the deconvolution were clarified through the study. The performance with the suggested parameters was evaluated with respect to compound identification for the actual sample. All of the test compounds in the sample were correctly identified with the GC Mixture Touch, outperforming AMDIS with respect to the identification. The GC Mixture Touch is easy to use on the web even for users without programming skills. This is expected to enhance the application of the NMF-based deconvolution, and it should prove helpful in finding the compounds hidden in complex mixtures that are difficult to find using conventional approaches.

Identifiers

PMID33553892
PMCPMC7860082
OpenAlexW3124783626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.