Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33553890›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

Machine Learning-Driven and Smartphone-Based Fluorescence Detection for CRISPR Diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2.

Aubin Samacoits, Pattaraporn Nimsamer, Oraphan Mayuramart, Naphat Chantaravisoot, Pitchaya Sitthi-Amorn, Chajchawan Nakhakes, Lumrung Luangkamchorn, Phongsakhon Tongcham, Ugo Zahm, Suchada Suphanpayak and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Machine Learning for CRISPR-Based Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Aubin SamacoitsSertis Corporation, Bangkok 10110, Thailand.
Pattaraporn NimsamerCenter of Excellence in Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Oraphan MayuramartCenter of Excellence in Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Naphat ChantaravisootCenter of Excellence in Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Pitchaya Sitthi-AmornDepartment of Computer Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chajchawan NakhakesDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Medical Technology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Lumrung LuangkamchornSchool of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Phongsakhon TongchamSchool of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
Ugo ZahmSertis Corporation, Bangkok 10110, Thailand.
Suchada SuphanpayakDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Medical Technology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Natta PadungwattanachokeDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Medical Technology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Nutcha LeelarthaphinDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Medical Technology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Hathaichanok HuayhongthongDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Medical Technology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Trairak PisitkunCenter of Excellence in Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Sunchai PayungpornCenter of Excellence in Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Pimkhuan Hannanta-AnanSchool of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, accurate, and low-cost detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to contain the transmission of COVID-19. Here, we present a cost-effective smartphone-based device coupled with machine learning-driven software that evaluates the fluorescence signals of the CRISPR diagnostic of SARS-CoV-2. The device consists of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed housing and low-cost optic components that allow excitation of fluorescent reporters and selective transmission of the fluorescence emission to a smartphone. Custom software equipped with a binary classification model has been developed to quantify the acquired fluorescence images and determine the presence of the virus. Our detection system has a limit of detection (LoD) of 6.25 RNA copies/μL on laboratory samples and produces a test accuracy of 95% and sensitivity of 97% on 96 nasopharyngeal swab samples with transmissible viral loads. Our quantitative fluorescence score shows a strong correlation with the quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) Ct values, offering valuable information of the viral load and, therefore, presenting an important advantage over nonquantitative readouts.

Identifiers

PMID33553890
PMCPMC7839157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.