ArticleHeliyon2021
Study of consistency of expert evaluations of wine sensory characteristics by positional analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wine chemistry and language bottleneck hypothesis: insights from large language models.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Comparison of Post-Consumption Attention Between Two Different Aroma Types of Baijiu Using the Stroop Task.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual characteristics inherent in the expert, as well as their physical and psycho-emotional state subject to the influence of random, uncontrollable factors, contribute to subjectivity in the sensory evaluation of wines. With great variability of opinions, the final results of sensory evaluation may become doubtful. The presence of a random component in the sensory evaluation justifies the use of statistical methods for analyzing the consistency of expert evaluations. Along with Spearman's correlation coefficients and Kendall matching, Cronbach alpha criterion was used to assess the consistency of expert opinions. The advantages of positional analysis have been discussed - Cronbach's alpha criterion is calculated not by the rank of expert points, but by the initial point scale considering its variability; it allows to evaluate the contribution of each expert to the consistency of expert evaluations, as well as the reliability of the total scale of points set for each wine sample. Based on the data analysis from sensory evaluation of the quality of dry red and white wines of Russian production, the results of the consistency study of expert evaluations as well as the reliability of the total score scale have been presented. What is more, analysis of the "loyalty" of experts in evaluating the quality of wines has been performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.