Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33553683›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry and biophysics reports2021

More attention on glial cells to have better recovery after spinal cord injury.

Sajad Hassanzadeh, Maryam Jalessi, Seyed Behnamedin Jameie, Mehdi Khanmohammadi, Zohre Bagher, Zeinab Namjoo, Seyed Mohammad Davachi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Spinal Cord Injury and Loss of Cortical Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Astrocytes and Microglia Exhibit Cell-Specific CaFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sajad HassanzadehSkull Base Research Center, Hazrat Rasoul Hospital, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam JalessiSkull Base Research Center, Hazrat Rasoul Hospital, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Behnamedin JameieNeuroscience Research Center (NRC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi KhanmohammadiSkull Base Research Center, Hazrat Rasoul Hospital, The Five Senses Health Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zohre BagherENT and Head & Neck Research Center and Department, The Five Senses Health Institute, Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zeinab NamjooDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad DavachiDepartment of Food Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRArdabil University of Medical Sciences · IRCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional improvement after spinal cord injury remains an unsolved difficulty. Glial scars, a major component of SCI lesions, are very effective in improving the rate of this recovery. Such scars are a result of complex interaction mechanisms involving three major cells, namely, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia. In recent years, scientists have identified two subtypes of reactive astrocytes, namely, A1 astrocytes that induce the rapid death of neurons and oligodendrocytes, and A2 astrocytes that promote neuronal survival. Moreover, recent studies have suggested that the macrophage polarization state is more of a continuum between M1 and M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages that encourage the inflammation process kill their surrounding cells and inhibit cellular proliferation. In contrast, M2 macrophages promote cell proliferation, tissue growth, and regeneration. Furthermore, the ability of oligodendrocyte precursor cells to differentiate into adult oligodendrocytes or even neurons has been reviewed. Here, we first scrutinize recent findings on glial cell subtypes and their beneficial or detrimental effects after spinal cord injury. Second, we discuss how we may be able to help the functional recovery process after injury.

Indexed as

A1 astrocyteA2 astrocyteCNS, Central Nervous SystemM1 and M2 macrophagesOPCsOPCs, Oligodendrocytes Progenitor CellsSCI, Spinal Cord InjurySpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33553683
PMCPMC7844125
OpenAlexW3121801604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.