Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33553510›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2019

Restoring vision at the fovea.

Juliette E McGregor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Aligning Visual Prosthetic Development With Implantee Needs.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  3. Aligning visual prosthetic development with implantee needs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Towards aJournal of neural engineering · 2022
    Article
  8. Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Juliette E McGregorCenter for Visual Science, University of Rochester, 601 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, New York, USA.

Funding

Physiological and perceptual examination of vision restoration R01EY021166 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MERIGAN, WILLIAM H · 2011 to 2023
$8.4M
Accelerating vision restoration with in-vivo cellular imaging of retinal functionU01EY025497 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILLIAMS, DAVID R · 2015 to 2019
$4.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021166NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans high quality, high acuity visual experience is mediated by the fovea, a tiny, specialized patch of retina containing the locus of fixation. Despite this, vision restoration strategies are typically developed in animal models without a fovea. While electrical prostheses have been approved by regulators, as yet they have failed to restore high quality, high acuity vision in patients. Approaches under pre-clinical development include regenerative cell therapies, optogenetics and chemical photosensitizers. All retinal vision restoration therapies require reactivation of inner retina that has lost photoreceptor input and that the restored signals can be interpreted at a behavioural level. A greater emphasis on tackling these challenges at the fovea may accelerate progress toward high quality vision restoration.

Identifiers

PMID33553510
PMCPMC7861459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.