Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33553500›Full record

ReviewTemperature (Austin, Tex.)2020

COVID-19 and thermoregulation-related problems: Practical recommendations.

Hein Daanen, Stephan Bose-O'Reilly, Matt Brearley, D Andreas Flouris, Nicola M Gerrett, Maud Huynen, Hunter M Jones, Jason Kai Wei Lee, Nathan Morris, Ian Norton and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Temperature (Austin, Tex.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Papers published by the journalTemperature (Austin, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hein DaanenDepartment of Human Movement Sciences. Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-0678
Stephan Bose-O'ReillyInstitute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-3103
Matt BrearleyNational Critical Care and Trauma Response Centre, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6655-3914
D Andreas FlourisFAME Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science, University of Thessaly, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-3915
Nicola M GerrettDepartment of Human Movement Sciences. Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5210-902X
Maud HuynenMaastricht University Institute (MSI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-2810
Hunter M JonesUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research in Service to the U.S. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4588-3911
Jason Kai Wei LeeDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-795X
Nathan MorrisUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-066X
Ian NortonRespond Global, Australia.
Lars NyboUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9090-1958
Elspeth OppermannDepartment Für Geographie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-8763
Joy Shumake-GuillemotWHO/WMO Joint Climate and Health Office, Geneva, Switzerland.
Peter Van den HazelVGGM, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic started in the cold months of the year 2020 in the Northern hemisphere. Concerns were raised that the hot season may lead to additional problems as some typical interventions to prevent heat-related illness could potentially conflict with precautions to reduce coronavirus transmission. Therefore, an international research team organized by the Global Health Heat Information Network generated an inventory of the specific concerns about this nexus and began to address the issues. Three key thermal and covid-19 related topics were highlighted: 1) For the general public, going to public cool areas in the hot season interferes with the recommendation to stay at home to reduce the spread of the virus. Conflicting advice makes it necessary to revise national heat plans and alert policymakers of this forecasted issue. 2) For medical personnel working in hot conditions, heat strain is exacerbated due to a reduction in heat loss from wearing personal protective equipment to prevent contamination. To avoid heat-related injuries, medical personnel are recommended to precool and to minimize the increase in body core temperature using adopted work/rest schedules, specific clothing systems, and by drinking cold fluids. 3) Fever, one of the main symptoms of COVID-19, may be difficult to distinguish from heat-induced hyperthermia and a resting period may be necessary prior to measurement to avoid misinterpretation. In summary, heat in combination with the COVID-19 pandemic leads to additional problems; the impact of which can be reduced by revising heat plans and implementing special measures attentive to these compound risks.

Indexed as

COVID-19heat planheat stresspandemicpersonal protective equipmentsars-CoV-2thermometry

Identifiers

PMID33553500
PMCPMC7849778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.