Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33553251›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020

Hemodynamic Relevance of Anomalous Coronary Arteries Originating From the Opposite Sinus of Valsalva-In Search of the Evidence.

Marius Reto Bigler, Afreed Ashraf, Christian Seiler, Fabien Praz, Yasushi Ueki, Stephan Windecker, Alexander Kadner, Lorenz Räber, Christoph Gräni

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Catheterization Techniques for Anomalous Aortic Origin of Coronary Arteries.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marius Reto BiglerDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Afreed AshrafDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christian SeilerDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Fabien PrazDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Yasushi UekiDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stephan WindeckerDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexander KadnerDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lorenz RäberDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph GräniDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery anomalies (CAA) represent a heterogeneous group of congenital disorders of the arterial coronary circulation, defined by an anomalous origin of the coronary ostium and/or vessel course. Of particular interest are anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS). The interarterial variants (with the anomalous vessel situated between the great arteries) are historically called "malignant," based on an anticipated higher risk for myocardial ischemia and sudden cardiac death (SCD), especially affecting young patients during strenuous physical activity. However, the interarterial course itself may not be the predominant cause of ischemia, but rather represents a surrogate for other ischemia-associated anatomical high-risk features. As the exact pathophysiology of ACAOS is not well-understood, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines addressing optimal diagnostic work-up, downstream testing, sports counseling, and therapeutic options in patients with ACAOS. Therefore, treating physicians are often left with uncertainty regarding the clinical management of affected patients. This review focuses on the pathophysiologic consequences of ACAOS on myocardial ischemia and discusses the concept of the interplay between fixed and dynamic coronary stenosis. Further, we discuss the advantages and limitations of the different diagnostic modalities and give an outlook by highlighting the gaps of knowledge in the assessment of such anomalies.

Indexed as

anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery (AAOCA)anomalous coronary arteries originating from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS)dobutamine-volume challengefixed vs. dynamic stenosisfractional flow reserve (FFR)hemodynamic relevanceintravascular ultrasound (IVUS)multimodality imaging

Identifiers

PMID33553251
PMCPMC7859106
OpenAlexW3121341131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.