ReviewFrontiers in medicine2020
Sphingolipidomics in Translational Sepsis Research-Biomedical Considerations and Perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical lipidomics in bacterial sepsis: a systematic review of serum and plasma evaluations.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Pooled it
- Integrative metabolite-protein interaction networks reveal potential pathways and biomarkers in sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Guided Multi-Omics Integration Identifies UGCG as a Candidate Lipid Metabolic Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target in Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Article
- Discrimination of serum metabolomics profiles in infants with sepsis, based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Serum Sphingolipids Aiding the Diagnosis of Adult HIV-Negative Patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.