Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33552942›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Radiation-Induced Sarcoma of the Head and Neck Following Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Single Institutional Experience and Literature Review.

Jianlin Lou, Lin Jiang, Xinshen Dai, Huanhuan Wang, Jia Yang, Liang Guo, Meiyu Fang, Shengye Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Radiation-induced sarcoma in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-institution retrospective study].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Profiling of Radiation-Induced Sarcomas Reveals the Immunologic Characteristics and Its Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianlin LouDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Lin JiangDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xinshen DaiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Huanhuan WangDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Jia YangDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Liang GuoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Meiyu FangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Shengye WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveRadiotherapy (RT) is the primary treatment option for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but it is associated with radiation-induced sarcomas (RISs). This study aims to investigate clinicopathological features and head and neck RIS prognosis after NPC RT.

methodsThe medical and radiological records of the NPC patients (n =14,074) referred to Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hang Zhou, China between January 1995 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 22 patients were determined to have RIS after RT for NPC. The clinicopathological data, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up results of 22 patients with RIS were analyzed in this retrospective research. All 22 patients underwent surgery as the main treatment. The levels of Overall Survival (OS) were determined through the Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsAmong these patients, 13 were males and nine females with the male/female ratio of 1.44:1. The age during the primary RT of NPC ranged from 25 to 61 years old (median age: 37 years old). Patients' ages ranged from 33 to 73 years old (median age: 52.5 years old) when diagnosed with RIS. The latency period for development of the RIS was between 3 and 36 years (median: 8.5 years) after RT. In this cohort, R0 resection was achieved in 13 cases, R1 resection in five cases, and R2 resection in four cases. During the follow-up period ranged from 2 to 102 months (median 14 months), 15 patients had died of the disease. Kaplan-Meier method showed that the 2-year, 3-year, and the 5-year cumulative OS rate was 50.3, 43.2, and 14.4%, respectively. The median survival time was 34 months. Surgical resection with R0 resection achieves a significantly better prognosis (P = 0.012). Patients under the age of 37 years old at the time of initial RT had a relatively better prognosis (P = 0.035).

conclusionsAlthough the incidence of RIS after RT of NPC is generally low, the treatment of RIS is very difficult. The RISs are associated with poor overall prognosis. R0 resection can improve the prognosis thus it should be considered as the primary and optimal choice for the treatment of RIS.

Indexed as

nasopharyngeal neoplasmsoperativeradioactivitysarcomasurgical procedurestreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33552942
PMCPMC7858657
OpenAlexW3123660658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.