ArticleJournal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR2019
Developing PIDF Curves From Dynamically Downscaled WRF Model Fields to Examine Extreme Precipitation Events in Three Eastern U.S. Metropolitan Areas.
Article in Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel framework for expanding temperature intensity-duration-frequency curve utility.Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Article
- EPA Dynamically Downscaled Ensemble (EDDE): Datasets for Adaptation and Resilience Planning for Environmental Endpoints.Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · 2025Article
- Projecting changes in extreme rainfall from three tropical cyclones using the design-rainfall approach.Nature climate change · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extreme precipitation events influence watershed, agriculture, and urban management. The probability of extreme precipitation is estimated for storm water management using precipitation intensity-duration-frequency (PIDF) curves. This study explores developing PIDF curves from dynamically downscaled 36- and 12-km simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Three modeled data sets are examined: 36-km WRF model forced with 2.5° (~275-km) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R2); 36-km WRF model forced with 0.75° (~80-km) ERA-Interim; and 12-km WRF model forced with ERA-Interim. The WRF outputs are verified against historical observations for three cities in the Eastern United States using a 23-year period (1988-2010). The 36-km WRF data set driven by R2 produced PIDF curves that were acceptable at the 12- to 24-hr durations, but those WRF data could not realistically simulate extremes represented by the high-intensity, short-duration precipitation events. Increasing the resolution of WRF's driving data from R2 to ERA-Interim did not improve WRF's representation of precipitation events. Using 12-km grid spacing enhances WRF's ability to reproduce PIDF curves developed from observations. Finer grid spacing dramatically improves the frequency and intensity of the 1- to 3-hr events and improves the 6- to 24-hr events. However, improvements with the 12-km WRF data did not apply equally to all study sites, suggesting further modifications to the WRF configuration and/or methodology are necessary. Although imperfect, the results here lend confidence to using modeled data to construct PIDF curves, which could be valuable for projecting changes to parameters used in urban and environmental planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.