ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Public Perception of Ideal Breast Shape.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- Validation of Ideal Breast Characteristics With Breast Augmentation Patients.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- Statistical Techniques Used in Public Perception of Ideal Breast Shape.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and valid assessments of the visual endpoints of aesthetic surgery procedures are needed. Currently, most assessments are based on the opinion of patients and their plastic surgeons. The objective of this research was to analyze the reliability of crowdworkers assessing de-identified photographs using a validated scale that depicts lower facial aging.
methodsTwenty photographs of the facial nasolabial region of various non-identifiable faces were obtained for which various degrees of facial aging were present. Independent crowds of 100 crowd workers were tasked with assessing the degree of aging using a photograph numeric scale. Independent groups of crowdworkers were surveyed at 4 different times (weekday daytime, weekday nighttime, weekend daytime, weekend nighttime), once a week for 2 weeks.
resultsCrowds assessing midface region photographs had an overall correlation of R = 0.979 (weekday daytime R = 0.991; weekday nighttime R = 0.985; weekend daytime R = 0.997; weekend nighttime R = 0.985). Bland-Altman test for test-retest agreement showed a normal distribution of assessments over the various times tested, with the differences in the majority of photographs being within 1 SD of the average difference in ratings.
conclusionsCrowd assessments of facial aging in de-identified photographs displayed very strong concordance with each other, regardless of time of day or week. This shows promise toward obtaining reliable assessments of pre and postoperative results for aesthetic surgery procedures. More work must be done to quantify the reliability of assessments for other pretreatment states or the corresponding results following treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.