ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Preoperative Flap Surgery Simulation for a Case of Cryptotia Using a 3D Printer.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cutting edge of customized surgery: 3D-printed models for patient-specific interventions in otology and auricular management-a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cryptotia is a congenital auricular deformity. Common methods of surgical reconstruction involve creating an auricular temporal groove using local flaps and/or a skin graft. However, it can be difficult to determine which method is most suited to the unique 3-dimensional (3D) structure of each cryptotic ear. Here, we showed that creating 3D ear models of a cryptotic ear with a 3D camera and printer and using these models to simulate surgery with two different flap methods (cat's-ear and square) allowed selection of a reconstruction method that led to good outcomes after the actual surgery. The patient was a 7-year-old girl with left cryptotia. A 3D camera was used to acquire 3D data for the ear. After structural analysis, a home 3D printer was used to print the data into 3D ear models using an elastic material. These models exhibited good plasticity. After subjecting the models to simulated cat's-ear and square flap surgeries, the cat's-ear flap method was considered to better reproduce the healthy side of the ear compared with the square flap method for this particular case. Ear morphology during and after the actual surgery closely resembled the model-ear morphology during and after the simulated cat's-ear flap surgery. We successfully created a full-scale 3D model with good plasticity using a 3D camera and 3D printer. This allowed easy, noninvasive preoperative evaluation and identification of the most suitable operation for the specific case, facilitating easier, more successful surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.