Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33552742›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Analysis of codon usage patterns of the chloroplast genome in

Huirong Duan, Qian Zhang, Chunmei Wang, Fang Li, Fuping Tian, Yuan Lu, Yu Hu, Hongshan Yang, Guangxin Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assembly of theGenes · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The organelle genomes of the endangered seagrassFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huirong DuanChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Qian ZhangChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Chunmei WangChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Fang LiInstitute of Grassland Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot, China.
Fuping TianChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Yuan LuChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Yu HuChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Hongshan YangChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Guangxin CuiChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Science, Lanzhou, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNLanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences · CNInstitute of Grassland Research · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCodon usage bias analysis is a suitable strategy for identifying the principal evolutionary driving forces in different organisms.

methodsSynonymous codon usage (SCU) and related indices of 51 coding sequences from the

resultsThe SCU bias of DISCUSSIONS: Our results provide a theoretical foundation for elucidating the genetic architecture and mechanisms of

Indexed as

Chloroplast genomeDelphinium grandiflorum L.Evolutionary forcesSynonymous codon usage bias

Identifiers

PMID33552742
PMCPMC7819120
OpenAlexW3124590060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.