ArticleJournal of European CME2021
"Incident Teaching (IT)" Lecture Series - Incorporating Education Surrounding Clinical Incidents and Complaints into Foundation Year 1 (FY1) Doctors' Induction.
Article in Journal of European CME, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are junior doctors' attitudes towards clinical incidents shifting in the post-COVID era? Introducing the 'Manalayil effect'.Future healthcare journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient safety incidents are any unintended or unexpected incidents which potentially could, or did, lead to harm to patients. Incident reports are crucial to improve patients' care and to identify further actions needed to prevent harm. A common view among the FY1 doctors in our local NHS Trust involved a fearful opinion surrounding being involved in clinical incidents. Significant anxiety in those situations prompted the need for a focus on the topic of "clinical incidents" during their induction to the Trust in two consecutive years of 2018 and 2019. A near-peer lecture series was delivered to new FY1 with qualitative pre- and post-lecture series feedbacks. Results from lecture series from two consecutive years showed all FY1 doctors agreed or strongly agreed that they had a good understanding of incidents following the lecture. Compared with their pre-course feedback, there was an increase of 6-fold (2018) and 8-fold (2019) in those that strongly agreed. Post-course, more than 90% of doctors reported that they would feel comfortable sharing with colleagues their involvement in an incident. In a growing culture of blame and litigation, it is important to address the harm associated with a blame-based culture. The process of investigating an incident has the potential to expose the areas of deficiency relating to an individual. Reducing stigma associated with incidents could theoretically reduce the second victim phenomenon. An open culture to incident reporting is a fundamental part of medical education and quality improvement. Encouraging this attitude amongst medical professionals and creating a supporting environment surrounding sharing of experiences will help to form a generation of doctors that see incident reporting in a positive light. Our model of lecture series could be utilised in other UK Foundation Programmes with the aim of enriching the FY1s' induction period.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.