Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33552455›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics and history of medicine2020

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a systematic review of medical students' attitudes in the last 10 years.

Alejandro Gutierrez-Castillo, Javier Gutierrez-Castillo, Francisco Guadarrama-Conzuelo, Amado Jimenez-Ruiz, Jose Luis Ruiz-Sandoval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Competing World Views, Professional Norms, and Conscience.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students' Opinions on Euthanasia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandro Gutierrez-CastilloResearcher, School of Medicine, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Nuevo León México, Mexico.
Javier Gutierrez-CastilloResearcher, School of Medicine, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Nuevo León México, Mexico.
Francisco Guadarrama-ConzueloResearcher, School of Medicine, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Nuevo León México, Mexico.
Amado Jimenez-RuizNeurology Resident, Department of Neurology, National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Ciudad de México, México.
Jose Luis Ruiz-SandovalProfessor, Department of Neurology, Civil Hospital of Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Jalisco, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed at examining the approval rate of the medical students' regarding active euthanasia, passive euthanasia, and physician-assisted-suicide over the last ten years. To do so, the arguments and variables affecting students' choices were examined and a systematic review was conducted, using PubMed and Web of Science databases, including articles from January 2009 to December 2018. From 135 identified articles, 13 met the inclusion criteria. The highest acceptance rates for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide were from European countries. The most common arguments supporting euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide were the followings: (

Indexed as

EuthanasiaMedical ethicsMedical studentsPhysician-assisted SuicideReligion.

Identifiers

PMID33552455
PMCPMC7839145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.