ArticleRadiology case reports2021
Reversed Robin Hood syndrome visualized by CT perfusion.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reversed Robin Hood Syndrome (RRHS) was first described in 2007 as a cause of worsening neurological deficit in the setting of an acute ischemic event. RRHS is the shunting of cerebral blood flow to nonstenotic vascular territories due to impaired vasodilation bought on by hypercapnia. A 77 year old lady presented with acute onset left hemiparesis and an exacerbation of her underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). CT angiography and perfusion visualized RRHS and appropriate treatment was initiated. Treatment strategies for RRHS differ considerably to those for acute ischemic stroke. Choosing the correct treatment strategy is decisive for good clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.