Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33552309›Full record

ArticleApplied research in quality of life2022

Health-Related Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessing Impacts of Job Loss and Financial Support Programs in Japan.

Takaaki Ikeda, Ataru Igarashi, Satomi Odani, Masayasu Murakami, Takahiro Tabuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied research in quality of life, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takaaki IkedaDepartment of Health Policy Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-4492
Ataru IgarashiYokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-6916
Satomi OdaniCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-4952
Masayasu MurakamiDepartment of Health Policy Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7100-391X
Takahiro TabuchiCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study examined the association between job loss during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the Japanese working population and whether universal financial support program has a protective influence on the HRQOL. Two self-reported internet surveys were used to determine job loss during the pandemic: one was conducted between February and March 2020, just before the COVID-19 emergency declaration by the Japanese government (April 2020), and the other was conducted between August and September 2020. For the dependent variable, we used the EQ-5D-5L utility score (QOL utility score), which was assessed between August and September 2020. The independent variables were job loss after the state of emergency was declared and two types of government financial support (either universal support or support targeting child-raising households). The Tobit regression model was applied, adjusting for covariates. Job loss during the pandemic was negatively associated with the QOL utility score in the fully adjusted model; the coefficient (95% confidence interval [CI]) for job loss during the pandemic was -0.07 (-0.11 to -0.03). For the government financial support variables, the universal financial support program was associated with a better QOL utility score of the coefficient (95% CI), 0.05 (0.03 to 0.08). Job loss during the COVID-19 pandemic is negatively associated with HRQOL, while universal financial support is positively associated with HRQOL. Our study results imply that universal financial support during the COVID-19 era has a protective influence on an individual's HRQOL. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11482-021-09918-6.

Indexed as

AllowanceEQ-5DEuro-QoLSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic statusSubsidy

Identifiers

PMID33552309
PMCPMC7846494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.