Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551723›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Evaluation of Functional Recovery in Rats After Median Nerve Resection and Autograft Repair Using Computerized Gait Analysis.

Johannes C Heinzel, Viola Oberhauser, Claudia Keibl, Nicole Swiadek, Gregor Längle, Helen Frick, Jonas Kolbenschlag, Cosima Prahm, Johannes Grillari, David Hercher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clicker Training Mice for Improved Compliance in the Catwalk Test.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Johannes C HeinzelDepartment of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Viola OberhauserLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia KeiblLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Nicole SwiadekLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Gregor LängleLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Helen FrickLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Jonas KolbenschlagDepartment of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Cosima PrahmDepartment of Hand, Plastic, Reconstructive and Burn Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Johannes GrillariLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
David HercherLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATUniversity of Tübingen · DEInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computerized gait analysis is a common evaluation method in rat models of hind limb nerve injuries, but its use remains unpublished in models of segmental nerve injury of the forelimb. It was the aim of this work to investigate if computerized gait analysis is a feasible evaluation method in a rat model of segmental median nerve injury and autograft repair. Ten male Lewis rats underwent 7-mm resection of the right median nerve with immediate autograft repair. The left median nerve was resected without repair and served as an internal control. Animals were assessed for 12 weeks after surgery

Indexed as

catwalkfunctional recoverygait analysisgrasping strengthmedian nervemicrosurgerynerve repairrats

Identifiers

PMID33551723
PMCPMC7859340
OpenAlexW3125702410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.