Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551630›Full record

ArticleConference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers2019

Detecting Causality using Deep Gaussian Processes.

Guanchao Feng, J Gerald Quirk, Petar M Djurić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conference record. Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guanchao FengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
J Gerald QuirkDepartment of Obstetrics/Gynecology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Petar M DjurićDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

Funding

Rethinking Electronic Fetal Monitoring to Improve Perinatal Outcomes and Reduce Frequency of Operative Vaginal and Cesarean DeliveriesR01HD097188 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI DJURIC, PETAR M, QUIRK, J GERALD · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD097188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convergent cross mapping (CCM) is a state space reconstruction (SSR)-based method designed for causal discovery in coupled time series, where Granger causality may not be applicable due to a separability assumption. However, CCM requires a large number of observations and is not robust to observation noise which limits its applicability. Moreover, in CCM and its variants, the SSR step is mostly implemented with delay embedding where the parameters for reconstruction usually need to be selected using grid search-based methods. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian version of CCM using deep Gaussian processes (DGPs), which are naturally connected with deep neural networks. In particular, we adopt the framework of SSR-based causal discovery and carry out the key steps using DGPs within a non-parametric Bayesian probabilistic framework in a principled manner. The proposed approach is first validated on simulated data and then tested on data used in obstetrics for monitoring the well-being of fetuses, i.e., fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine activity (UA) signals in the last two hours before delivery. Our results indicate that UA affects the FHR, which agrees with recent clinical studies.

Indexed as

convergent cross mappingdeep Gaussian processesfetal heart ratestate space reconstructionuterine activity

Identifiers

PMID33551630
PMCPMC7861477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.