Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551572›Full record

ArticleMaterials science & engineering. R, Reports : a review journal2020

Materials for blood brain barrier modeling

Magali P Ferro, Sarah C Heilshorn, Roisin M Owens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials science & engineering. R, Reports : a review journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. HumanBioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magali P FerroDepartment of Bioelectronics, Mines Saint-Étienne, 880 route de Mimet, F-13541, Gardanne, France.
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Roisin M OwensDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Philippa Fawcett Drive, CB30AS, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Engineered biomaterials to modulate cell-cell signaling for the robust expansion of stem cellsR01EB027171 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HEILSHORN, SARAH C · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain homeostasis relies on the selective permeability property of the blood brain barrier (BBB). The BBB is formed by a continuous endothelium that regulates exchange between the blood stream and the brain. This physiological barrier also creates a challenge for the treatment of neurological diseases as it prevents most blood circulating drugs from entering into the brain.

Indexed as

Basement membraneBiomaterialBlood brain barrierExtracellular matrixMechanotransductionOrgan-on-chipShear stress

Identifiers

PMID33551572
PMCPMC7864217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.