ArticleApplied energy2021
Quantitative assessment of U.S. bulk power systems and market operations during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Applied energy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of the COVID-19 lockdown on building energy consumption and indoor environment: A case study in Dalian, China.Energy and buildings · 2022Article
- Future assessment of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the electricity market based on a stochastic socioeconomic model.Applied energy · 2022Article
- An impact study of COVID-19 on the electricity sector: A comprehensive literature review and Ibero-American survey.Renewable & sustainable energy reviews · 2022Review
- Global low-carbon energy transition in the post-COVID-19 era.Applied energy · 2022Article
- Multiscale effects masked the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on electricity demand in the United States.Applied energy · 2021Article
- Decarbonizing the energy supply one pandemic at a time.Energy policy · 2021Article
- Data-driven operation of the resilient electric grid: A case of COVID-19.Journal of engineering (Stevenage, England) · 2021Review
- COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown, and consequences for a fossil fuel-dominated electricity system.AIP advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Starting in early 2020, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severely attached the U.S., causing substantial changes in the operations of bulk power systems and electricity markets. In this paper, we develop a data-driven analysis to substantiate the pandemic's impacts from the perspectives of power system security, electric power generation, electric power demand and electricity prices. Our results suggest that both electric power demand and electricity prices have discernibly dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic. Geographically diverse impacts are observed and quantified, while the bulk power systems and markets in the northeast region are most severely affected. All the data sources, assessment criteria, and analysis codes reported in this paper are available on a GitHub repository.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.